Friday, March 20, 2009

How I Became James Lovelock's Accidental Student, Come Hell and High Water

How I Became James Lovelock's Accidental Student, Come Hell and High Water

REJECTED BY UK OBSERVER COMMENTARY PAGE: Dan,
Sorry for the delay in replying. I have been in Ireland for the last week.
Thanks for the piece. it's not really for me, I'm afraid as it is more
about your journey than a comment piece.
All the best with it though,
Editor
Observer



Danny Bloom explains how he became a climate activist in Taiwan, calling
for Polar Cities to House "Breeding Pairs in the Arctic" in the Far
Distant Future


Published by the UK GUARDIAN, [in some future parallel universe]

TAIPEI, TAIWAN -- I've often been asked by inquiring journalists overseas how I came to
be "James Lovelock's Accidental Student".

Let me explain: Two years ago I read Fiona Harvey's wonderful lunchtime
interview in the Financial Times in the UK with Dr Lovelock over
some good wine they were sharing in London, and in the interview, and
in other places, Lovelock talked about his vision
of the far distant future being a place in northern regions where the
only survivors left on Earth, perhaps just 200,000 people,
would be "breeding pairs in the Arctic". This hit me hard, right in
the gut and right in the center of my brain, too. I kept thinking
about those words for a few days and finally I asked myself, where
will these "breeding pairs" live, I mean, what kind of settlements
will they be housed in, and where will these settlements be located?
And also: who will govern these settlements, and who will be
allowed in, or who will get in, and will they survive the long long
Long Emergency that will be happeneing then -- an event I now call The
Great Interruption -- and so one afternoon after waking up from a nap
in my cave in Taiwan I envisioned something like "polar cities" for
these breeding pairs in Lovelock's Arctic. That's how the term polar
cities was born. And that is how I became James Lovelock's Accidental
Student. This was also around the same time as the IPCC report was
coming out in February 2007 to great media fanfare and there were
headlines every day in my local English newspaper in Taiwan, so I was
obsessing with the issues of climate change and global warming for the
first time in my life. Just two years ago. Before that, I was not
involved in this activism or visionary thinking at all.

I knew I needed to put this idea of polar cities for breeding
pairs into some kind of visual showcase, because when I first started
blogging about my polar cities idea, the response was basically no
response at all. The words themselves -- polar cities for survivors of
global warming in the year 2500 or so -- just did not wake people up
and attract interest from readers or reporters or bloggers. So I knew
I needed some kind of visual to show what I was talking about.

Near my home in Taiwan, there was a small advertising agency run by a
pontailed man named Deng Cheng-hong. I rode my bicycle over to his
shop one Sunday afternoon and asked him if he could illustrate my
polar cities idea with some hand-drawn art or some computer-generated
work. He also had never really thought about global warming in a very
deep way, either, but he understand what I was talkingh about, even
though he did not speak English and I do not speak Chinese, but we
communicated and I showed him some very rough sketches I had done up
at my home in pencil and crayon on paper. He took these sketches and 8
weeks later came back with these wonderful, color illustrastions of
his artistic view of what a polar city blueprint might look like. I
knew this was it. He had given life to my vision, which I gotten from
Dr Lovelock's interviews and books and speeches. Dr Lovelock is my
mentor in all this.

When I showed Mr Deng's images to reporters in the USA -- and to Dr
Lovelock himself in the UK by email -- the response was very positive.
The New York Times blog Dot Earth, written by veteran science reporter
Andrew C. Revkin, wrote about polar cities, with Deng's images printed
on the blog as well, on March 29, 2008. The response was immediate,
both pro and con. I have not stopped promoting polar cities since that
day. The New York Times gave me the greenlight and I decided to spend
the rest of my life promoting and talking about, both pro and con,
polar cities. But this was not part of my life plan before 2006. I am
a writer, an editor, a poet, a dreamer. But after I read Lovelock's
words about "breeding pairs in the Arctic" I became haunted, obsessed,
with those words. And here I am, age 60, James Lovelock's Accidental
Student. I have no PHD, no academic sponors, no credibility at all. I
am nobody. I am nothing. AndI love this work. This is my life's work
now. A few more years here on Planet Earth and then I'm gone. I care
about the future. Deeply. I care about what life will be like on Earth
30 generations down the road, in 2500 or so. Polar cities might save
us from extinction.

I have never met or spoken with Dr Lovelock but I did once send him an
email with images of Deng's polar city designs
and he replied: "Thanks, for showing
me those images. It may very well happen, and soon!"

What's next for my seemingly impossible polar cities quest?

I plan to keep quietly promoting the concept of polar cities, what I
also call climate retreats for climate refugees, for the rest of my
life. These polar cities will be not be at the poles per se. They will
be in northern and southern regions of the world, from Tasmania and
New Zealand and Patagonia and Antarctica in the southern hemisphere to
Alaska and Canada and Russia and Greenland and Iceland and Norway in
the north. These polar cities are where Lovelock's breeding pairs will
live. We need to think hard about who will get in, who will govern
them, who will administer them, and what life inside will be like.
That's my brief.

Lovelock gave this brief to me. He does not know it, but he gave it to
me. I am just following in his footsteps. Using my visionary skills
and out-of-the-box thinking and global PR skills to create an important
discussion, both pro and con, online, in print and in classrooms, too.
Who gave me this brief? I gave it to
myself. I am James Lovelock's Accidental Student. It's energizing. I
enjoy this work.
It's my 24/7 obsession, but a healthy, productive, creative obsession.
Thank you, James Lovelock! But all this is not something that makes me
happy, and it's not a pretty picture. We are talking about some very
dark times coming down the road in 30 generations or so. I don't get
enjoyment out of this work. But I do get a sense of doing something
positive and important. And I remain an optimist, despite what it
might seem. I am an eternal optimist. That is why I envisioned polar
cities to save humanity from extinction in some future time when
global warming's major impact events have reduced the human tribe to
just 200,000 men, women and children barely surviving -- but
surviving, yes! -- in polar cities scattered around the world. The
Earth's populations of humans will have dropped by then from 25
billion to just 200,000 souls.As Dr Lovelock's accidental student,
with a phd or an academic backing, I plan to keep trying to promote
polar cities an important adaptation idea for the future.

It's not easy catching the attention of the news media or reporters
around the world. Although it's easy to get a mention or two about
polar cities on blogs and websites, it's almost impossible to get a
story about my work in a print publication anywhere in the world.
In fact, this essay is the first to ever appear in print, and I thank
the editors for publishing this.

Just to show how hard the path is, in terms of getting any mainstream
media coverage of my cockamamie idea, a reporter for a major wire news
service in Europe recently told me in a friendly email, explaining why
he could not write about polar cities for his
agency or interview me for a story: "I appreciate the originality of
your idea of polar cities, and your enthusiasm, and
your independence. I really do. But unless you are a scientist or
engineer, or your idea has gotten some serious traction somewhere, I
cannot justify doing a separate piece on you and your work. But I have
made a note of your website and your work, and if the opportunity
arises for me to allude to them, I will get back in touch. Interesting
coincidence: I spent an hour in conversation with Dr.
Lovelock yesterday."

5 comments:

amoeba said...

Your Strapline ends: '...,YOU DECIDE.'

I beg to differ! If humanity continues on its descent on the helter-skelter to self-inflicted climate change and who knows what?

It is surely mother Nature and not us, who will decide what parts of the planet [if any] remain habitable for large mammals like us.

dan said...

amoeba,

strapline? thanks. i didn;t know that thing was called a strapline, thanks for teaching me......why is it called a strapline, like a strap on a subway hanging down from main title? cool...

i had head of tagline for adverts, but not strapline. thanks for heads up. learn soemthing new every day at age 60. SMILE

and YOU ARE RIGHT, it will be mom Nature, not us, who decides.....you are right....we need to be ready and prepared, but you are right, it is Mom nature who will decide this...

any sugggestions on how we can prepare mentally or spiritally? that's my main reserach now.

good ideas welcome

DANNY

email me offline anytime at danbloom gmail dot com

dan said...

you know, amopeba, even without knowing your website or region of world, i kinda thought you were from UK, why? You guys over there seem to be much more aware and keyed into all this than my fellow Americans......and i left the USA in 1991 never to return...goodbye to all that and all that.....Majorca poet!

amoeba said...

Yes, I am from the UK! Just outside London.

I suspect part of the reason why Brits are often more aware of the truth about climate is because the tentacles of disinformation have to compete with output from the BBC. Although with Murdoch's SKY, CNN and many US orientated 'information' sources, that may change.

Let's hope the scientific truth aided by Obama, can make the lemmings that are deceived by the denialist interests see the light!

dan said...

Bonjour Amoeba,
i have written an oped commentary on my polar cities idea via Lovelock for the Observer paper in the UK, they did not ask for it, I had to ask them if they might want to look at it and they said yes we will look at it but cannot promise we will print so i sent to the editor there today and I am waiting to see if i get the greenlight on this "James Lovelock
's Accidental Student" article i wrote on my blog, revised and cleaned up for the paper of course. No US paper will print it.