Saturday, March 7, 2020

lauren groff vs the preppers -- an online brouhaha that will have no end?

"Look, climate change is the greatest problem of our time, the thing that is probably going to kill humanity. We’re standing on the edge of the cliff, there’s a hurricane blowing, and we’re whistling merrily into the wind," Florida author Lauren Groff  said. "It feels to me as if there’s a sword of Damocles hanging over our heads. It often feels like the human future is closing down, becoming smaller and darker. How much time do we have left to turn things around with climate change? Ten, twenty, fifty years?"

http://blog.pshares.org/index.php/were-standing-on-the-edge-of-the-cliff-an-interview-with-lauren-groff/

''For the piece, I went undercover at a doomsday prepper camp in North Carolina. I thought I was going to die the entire time. It was the scariest thing I’ve done in a long time.''

JK: Did you tell your kids what you were going to do?

LG: Yes, and they told all of my friends that weekend that “Mommy is at apocalypse camp!” I don’t own a gun. I didn’t even bring a multi-tool. And a great number of doomsday preppers believe in stocking up guns to use against what they call the “zombie hordes.”

Waiting for the End of the World

Apocalypse camp at the dawn of the Great Extinction

By

EARLY COMMENTS ONLINE TWITTER:

@Orianabklyn -- "Survivalism, as it exists in America, is not rational. It is emotional. It is the twisting of hypermasculine fear into a semblance of preparedness and rationality." on Apocalypse Camp, preppers, and how we'll face the end of the world:

@RogueOttawan   PINNEDdowninNCR

''Sorry, that was "Lauren Groff", not Goff. I'm assuming . Twitterfingers on my part. On the larger point, I am ever more convinced different subgroups- hers, me, preppers, countless others, are increasingly ill-equipped to psychoanalyze one another using our own terms./ ''

Just read Lauren Groff on on . Fascinating bit of cross cultural commentary from, to me, one alien species exploring another.''
Interesting to note what strikes people. She comments on the overwhelming whiteness- no surprise. Mostly rural small town older people. How else? I liked her line "They seem proudly working class". The horror. What a thing to seem proud of. /
And while I get that preppers are a quite Individualist/ community, I noted her call to get them to "understand the necessity of the common good". "The common good" does not have a shared definition anywhere in the world. I'm pretty collectivist compared to prepper Americans. I doubt my idea of who the common good is, what it is, or its prospects are Lauren Goff's. Funny how easily we all slip into the idea that everyone shares our definition of the common good & thus any opposition must reject said good.
  1. material possessions, and how this might fit into an elaborate and yet not subtle race/gender/psychopolitical model. There are considerations here obvious even to me, fat, soft, urbanite, classical music enthusiast Canadian. One is that under many conditions, many of your /
  2. 1 reply
  3. Show this thread
  1. possessions ARE the survival of yourself or your own family or group. Under conditions of significant collapse, the more so. So protecting your material possessions is a stand-in for protecting yourself. This strikes me as obvious enough, so framing it with that phrase 'material/
  2. 1 reply
  3. Show this thread


    1. Mar 4
    1. possessions' seems a cynical way to manipulate the scenario to provoke an unwarranted emotional reaction in the reader. It feels uncharitable to assume that was the point. Another consideration is that, let's face it, few if any humans value all humans or their lives equally. /

                                           
    1.
    A man is to carry himself in the presence of all opposition, as if every thing were titular and ephemeral but he.*
    I rose long before dawn, too thrilled to sleep, and set off to find my tribe. North from Greenville in the dark, past towns with names like Sans Souci and Travelers Rest, over the border into North Carolina, through land so choked by kudzu that the overgrown trees in the dark looked like great creatures petrified in mid-flight. The weirdness of this scene would, by the end of the weekend, show itself to be appropriate: my trip would be all about romanticism, and romanticism is a human collision with place that results, as Baudelaire put it, “neither in choice of subject nor exact truth, but in a way of feeling.” My rental car’s engine whined as it climbed the mountains. Day was just breaking when I nosed down a hill to Orchard Lake Campground, where tents were still being erected in the dimness.
    * All italicized quotations are from Ralph Waldo Emerson’s essay “Self-Reliance.”
    Il


    I had come to this place September 27-29  just outside the town of Saluda, 40 miles south of Asheville, for Prepper Camp, a 3-day weekend gathering that would draw 1200 people to learn how to survive what they call TEOTWAWKI, or The End of the World as We Know It. The camp was started in 2014 by a husband-and-wife team, Rick and “Prepper Jane” Austin, celebrities in the doomsday field. Its 6th iteration would take place on a late-September weekend with downpours forecast for all three days—I had bought waterproof everything—but which would turn out to be so uncannily hot that it could have been full-blown summer. I had left my husband Clay Kallmann in Gainesville with our 2 children, boys 6 and 9, Beckett and Sky. I put on my reporter's hat.

    In a still-dark field, a man wearing an orange shirt that read i’m a parking cone guided my car into place. The sky in its slow dawning revealed high blue shards of clouds, hills rich with goldenrod, a pond scummy at the edges. I reclined my seat to rest and to watch the preppers pass by. They were mostly male, between their late fifties and early seventies, with such an abundance of paunch that the only possible reaction was to marvel. These men were straight-up gravid. They seemed proudly working-class and most were former military, a fact made clear by the patches and medals they wore like over-the-hill Eagle Scouts. Nearly everyone was white. Over the weekend, I would count exactly nine visibly non-white preppers, three of whom were presenters. The camp’s organizers were surely aware of their target demographic; one volunteer had made up a little cartoon character named Pappy Prepper, a bearded old white man in camouflage pants, who in a promotional video for the gathering sang a song to the tune of “My Favorite Things”:
    Ways to store water and defensive shooting
    Grow secret gardens and stop folks from looting . . .
    As the day came on around me, I listened to the human parking cone cheerfully directing traffic. “You handicap?” he shouted toward a giant pickup.
    From the truck there was a hemming. At last, one of the men inside shouted, “He’s too proud to tell you he’s a wounded veteran.”
    “Aren’t we all!” said Parking Cone.
    A river of grim and portly old men flowed by, and I felt shy in my civilian womanhood and comparative youth. I waited until I saw a pair of women in hiking boots and flak vests, and gathered my courage to follow them out into the cluster of tents optimistically called the Prepper Camp Shopping Mall. Nearly all the instructors and speakers this weekend would be unpaid, trading their expertise for the opportunity to sell their books and other goods and to market their survivalist services. There were tents peddling batteries, huge water-storage tanks, medical equipment, army-navy surplus, and something called colloidal silver, which purportedly had antibiotic properties. (When I asked how it worked, the woman selling it gestured vaguely and said, “It just does!”) An angel-faced woman named Mary in a doeskin skirt advertised a permaculture school. An eager young man from a company called Ten Foot Wall sold a USB drive that can create virtual, hermetic computers within your computer, in order to block people and software from tracking your online movements and purchases. There was a table displaying weaponry, and propped at the edge of the nearby pond, there was a target in the shape of a human body. Even early in the morning, the pond was full of children tooling around in kayaks and canoes.
    Prevalent iconography included eagles, crosses both Celtic and Latin, the Don’t Tread on Me snake flag (aka the Gadsden flag), and the Confederate Stars and Bars. There were MAGA hats galore, so many that by Sunday I would lose the thrill of fury at seeing one. There were T-shirts bearing such phrases as: we are the virus they want to destroy; pro-god, pro-gun; live free or die hard; the calm before the storm. The right shoulder sleeves of many shirts featured backward flags, which I took to have sinister intent until I discovered that this was a convention of military uniforms, meant to show the banner flying as though in a breeze. My favorite tee depicted Ronald Reagan unbuttoning his dress shirt to reveal a chest made out of the American flag.
    A sweet-faced woman beaming over a basket of apples invited me to take one. come hear a dramatic reading of the best-selling book in history! a sign behind her read. The Bible? I guessed. Her face fell a little, but then she laughed. She was pushing her husband’s self-published disaster-survival fiction series; she’d put up the sign to lure people in. I said I’d love a reading. He, one Timothy A. Van Sickel, was a good sport and read to me in a sonorous voice from Genesis, and then from his own work. He read very nicely, I told him. One day three years ago, he said, he’d come home from his contracting job with the epiphany that his true mission was fiction—survivalist fiction, in particular. He’d published five books since then. Five books in three years! I marveled. I felt for him: he had the eager, shy desperation all authors feel when they have to hawk their souls in public. I wanted to tell him that boy howdy I could empathize, but I couldn’t out myself so early. Preppers are notoriously private, keeping their end-of-the-world plans so ferociously guarded that they even have a name for their secrecy: OPSEC, operational security. Self-published writers could be trusted because they worked outside the system; a literary insider in the preppers’ midst might be considered a double agent. Which of course, I had begun to see, I was.
    It was already too late to blend in, though. I hadn’t known before I arrived that at Prepper Camp camo and olive drab were the markers of belonging. Even very old ladies who certainly had never seen active duty wore camouflage sun hats and plastic clogs. I watched the people around me with a creeping sense of dismay. With a jolt, I saw that I was also being watched in return. I understood then that being a woman alone in this place was already unusual; far worse, I was wearing East Coast liberal-arts-college clothes, a Patagonia fleece, and a North Face backpack. I looked like a good bourgeoise, the kind of woman who drinks kombucha and does yoga and reads Harper’s before bed.
    A blond giant with a militiaman’s face and two sullen-looking girls in their early twenties with blurry blue tattoos on their arms milled nearby. They were staring me down hard. “Well,” said the Viking. “Guess it takes all kinds.” The girls snorted. I blushed with a shame the intensity of which I hadn’t felt since I was a bullied middle schooler, and fled to the white open-sided tents around the pond where the classes would be held.
    2.
    I hope in these days we have heard the last of conformity and consistency. Let the words be gazetted and ridiculous henceforward.
    Perhaps I should have expected to feel wildly out of place at Prepper Camp. I am a vegetarian atheist agnostic raised-Christian feminist in a creative field who sits to the left of most American socialists: I want immediate and radical action to halt climate change; Medicare and free public higher education for all; abortion pills offered for pennies in pharmacies and gas stations; the eradication of billionaires; the destruction of capitalism; and the rocketing of all the planet’s firearms into the sun.
    And yet I am also, in the darkest corners of my heart, a doomsday prepper myself. I live in Florida, where hurricane season runs officially from June through November, and both the Gulf and the Atlantic are regularly beset by calamitous storms. It just makes sense, living on that vulnerable spit of land between two roiling, unpredictable bodies of water, to ensure that one’s house has at least a two-month supply of food and at least nine modes of procuring drinking water in case society breaks and city services are cut off. (My family’s are: a rain barrel [1]; filtration straws [2]; a sun oven to pasteurize water with solar heat [3]; a Sawyer Squeeze water-filtration system [4]; a hundred-gallon airtight bladder, to be filled at the first sign of trouble [5]; a gas grill for boiling [6] and, in a pinch, dew collection [7]; iodine tablets [8]; and a tub with a tarp over it to let evaporation run off into a clean bowl [9].) We have medical kits in both of our cars and bug-out bags prepared for each family member, in case we have to flee in minutes. This kind of preparation is all still somewhat in the realm of the normal. Less so: I have negotiated for my family a hideout in New England with a fully stocked tiny house that has a woodstove and solar heat, with forests around it for firewood and cleared land for gardening. There are established fruit trees, water sources, and plenty of wildlife, if necessity forces us to set aside our moral revulsion and kill our fellow creatures for sustenance. In both Florida and New England, I have libraries of foraging and food-storage books; if I don’t always have direct knowledge, I know where to find it. I take boxing classes for self-defense; I have made my children learn archery. I have signed them up, for years, with the Boy Scouts so they will know how to build fires and handle knives safely, even though its soft-focus, quasi–Hitler Youth nationalism makes me queasy.
    It is not that I have horrendous visions of an electromagnetic pulse taking out the world’s power grids, or of oil and gas production ceasing and leaving seven billion humans to revert to the pre-industrial era, or even of World War III being launched on an otherwise normal day because Trump can’t resist the urge to push the big red button. But I can see how fragile the institutions of society are and how ever-more frayed they are becoming under the weight of late-stage capitalism. I see in vivid near-hallucinations how climate change will exacerbate every human-rights issue until we cannibalize ourselves. There will be mass displacement, pandemics, tribalist violence, genocide, food and water scarcity, deforestation, desertification, cities underwater. The warming planet, the mass extinction that has already begun, the fact that I need my children to live at least beyond the span of my own life: these things murmur in my ears, give me waking nightmares. Such profound eschatological horror can only be slain by action. I ready myself for as many possibilities as I can so that I may keep my raging anxiety under control.
    And so, in the depths of my climate-grief insomnia, I read my little library of books and go online to prepper blogs and Reddit threads to find new and more efficient modes of survival. But it is lonely to lurk on the internet, a diabolical invention that isolates people even as it feigns connection. Also, a novelist is already a professional autodidact; when it comes to the survival of the human race, I want to be told the things I don’t know enough about to seek them out myself. Hence Prepper Camp. I was so excited about the tidal wave of information I would be facing among my doomsday peers that I couldn’t sleep for a week beforehand. All that weekend, my children would tell my friends in Florida with wild grins that no, I wasn’t home: Mommy is at Apocalypse Camp!
    3.
    An institution is the lengthened shadow of one man.
    When I was still at home, the classes on the schedule had seemed a bizarre blend of two types: hippie homesteading and paranoid militarism, without a great deal of intersection between the two. I was far more interested in the hippie classes, as they might give me useful practical knowledge and would not involve discussion of killing my fellow humans. One of my first classes was “SHTF (Shit-Hits-the-Fan) Intelligence,” which I believed was going to be about the extremely rarefied things one needed to know in a catastrophe: how to plan escape routes ahead of time, where to buy laminated maps, how to use a compass, and how to gauge whether to stay put or flee depending on what one understood of the catastrophe at hand. Instead, the instructor, a former soldier named Samuel Culper who heads up an organization called Forward Observer, described how his group tracks civil unrest via social media, police scanners, and on-the-ground observers.
    I couldn’t understand how tracking protests against police violence from a tent somewhere had anything to do with prepping. But I regained some sense of my enthusiasm by proceeding to classes on permaculture, which I believe in deeply. Industrial agriculture is poisoning the planet and our bodies; we’re all better off growing as much of our own food as possible. Our host, Rick Austin, sweating through his khaki shirt in a circle from shoulder to sternum, gave such a thrilling talk about “Secret Gardens and Greenhouses” that I bought his book, Secret Garden of Survival, at the prepper mall afterward. Austin had been a commercial farmer, growing apples in New Hampshire and oranges in Florida, when he realized that agriculture’s traditional rows of plants were not designed for the plants’ sake, but for the sake of the machinery that sows and harvests it; in a post-doomsday world without heavy machinery, and with smaller-scale, nonindustrial agriculture, farmers would do better to plant crops the way crops want to grow.
    Austin showed pictures of the evolution of a garden on his mountainside homestead, first stripped to the topsoil, then planted in “guilds” of fruit or nut trees surrounded by symbiotic plantings of berries and vines and useful nitrogen fixers. The result within only a few years was a garden so lush and productive it now doesn’t look like a garden, doesn’t need weeding, watering, pesticides, or nutrients, and provides many pounds of food per square foot.
    Gladness had taken root in me again. Next was a talk on “Frugal Homesteading” by a man who would end up being my favorite of all the instructors, John Moody, a goofy, smart guy who quickly got the audience on his side by calling one of the volunteers passing by a “discount Fabio.” Moody told us he had once attended seminary; had cured himself of duodenal ulcers with food; and had bought a farm with his family that initially had less than 0.5 percent viable soil and was now a functioning homestead. He was one of the few instructors who seemed willing to think beyond standard prepper lore. One of his tips was that survivalists often prioritized the wrong things. They may spend years prepping for an electromagnetic pulse (EMP) from the sun that would in theory take out communication systems and thus all of civilization, though, as Moody said, “Most people in this room are going to die of diabetes and heart disease.” At this, the audience gasped in audible dismay.
    But to me, it felt a little validating to hear Moody say this: I had been astonished at how physically unfit nearly every attendee at Prepper Camp appeared to be. Even many of the younger preppers were obese, and health problems were visible and rampant. There were more canes and hiking sticks than athletic bodies. Moody said that when he heard an unfit man bragging, “I’m up to seven Glocks,” he wanted to reply, “Well, sell two and get a membership to Gold’s Gym.” Did people think they could fire a gun into a tornado, a storm surge, a wildfire? Most attendees very clearly couldn’t run a single mile to escape disaster, and fitness is among the most essential tools for flight. (For that matter, I wondered why there were no classes on how to get sick or disabled people to safety. Were they planning to leave Grandma behind with a semiautomatic and a fistful of beef jerky and hope she’d still be there when they crept back a few weeks later?)
    Next up was “Anti-kidnapping and Hostage Survival,” where two “barrel-chested freedom fighters,” a man named Billy Jensen (former Green Beret and surveillance officer turned antiterrorism instructor) and a woman named Check Freedman (held hostage and raped at sixteen, she’d become a federal agent and “police asset”) taught us how not to get taken. I looked around the room at the aged and the infirm and the unfamous, the salt of the earth, wondering who, exactly, the intended audience was for this talk: Weren’t the people who got kidnapped usually journalists, or the wealthy, or the children of the powerful?
    At “Getting Your Head Right,” Benjamin Raven Pressley wore an olive vest with spangled wings on it, said he was part Cherokee, and called himself a “spiritual guide coach.” At “Gold and Silver,” Keith Iton, one of two African-American presenters I noted, urged us to collect gold and silver for the End Times. At “Homestead Herbals,” Suzanne Upton free-associated about which herbs were good for which diseases. Basil for high cholesterol, Spilanthes for numbing, bloodroot for warts, dandelion for the liver, pine pollen for androgens, sweet gum for the lungs. And so on, for an hour.
    Finally, at the “Sun Cooking” demonstration, there was the weekend’s first (and, it turned out, only) discussion of concerns outside the scope of the individual. Paul Munsen, president of Sun Ovens International, showed off his miracle cookers, which need only solar heat to work. In addition to his descriptions of baking bread and boiling eggs with the sun, he talked about climate change; deforestation; and the fact that 2.5 billion people today still cook over fires, which takes a huge amount of time, contributes to environmental collapse, and gives people respiratory diseases. He had met Nelson Mandela and spoke fondly of him. He even said the word “progressive” as though it were a good thing, bless him. I was shaken to realize that this was the first discussion of climate change I had heard all day; that though there was plenty of talk about defense against kidnappers and nuclear, biological, or chemical warfare, the actual calamity bearing down on humanity, that great elephant in the room pressing us all to the wall, had been almost entirely ignored.
    4.
    I tell thee, thou foolish philanthropist, that I grudge the dollar, the dime, the cent, I give to such men as do not belong to me and to whom I do not belong.
    During the brief dinner break, I went with a misty head to set up my tent in the overflow campground. The other preppers were just hanging out; they watched without speaking as I struggled with my equipment. I tried to be as quiet as possible—a mouse. God forbid they search my camp when I was gone, I thought. They’d find books of poetry. I began to think that it was perhaps an oversight to have brought no weapons, not even a multi-tool, to this place that now seemed very obviously teeming with them.
    Because I didn’t trust myself to make a campfire while others were watching, I had brought food that I didn’t have to cook: oranges, granola and almond milk, peanut butter and jelly. I ate in my tent, and with my hand-crank flashlight, I read Rick Austin’s book. It didn’t take more than twenty minutes; I finished pretty bummed out that I had spent $35 on the thing. Though it contains some good ideas, it suffers the lack of editorial attention typical of self-published works, offering only the vaguest recommendations, with eccentric punctuation and terrible photography, and it included the only instance of overt racism (putting aside the MAGA gear and Confederate flags) that I saw all weekend: a photo of the “zombie hordes” that Rick Austin believes will be swarming the land and stealing his food during the apocalypse, credited to the Associated Press, actually depicts desperate brown people wading with their children to dry land.
    I thought back to something Jensen had said at the anti-kidnapping class: “As a soldier, though I’m a Christian, I have to dehumanize the people I’m fighting against.” All day, I had been set back on my heels by the survivalists’ suspicious attitude toward others. You could only treat suffering people as “zombies” if you stripped them of all their humanity.
    Source photographs: Paul Munsen and Richard Cleveland. From Business Insider © 2019 Hilary Brueck/Insider Inc.
    5.
    To be great is to be misunderstood.
    I went back out into the dusk, sad and lonely. The air was hazed with smoke from campfires and smelled of delicious hot food. The campers had hooked up their phones and speakers to electrical outlets and were playing classic rock while they cooked. Boxer dogs seemed to be the favorite animals of these survivalists. Little kids rode along zip lines. The faint smell of sewage came off the pond, and a tulip tree by its edge was shedding yellow leaves. Older children jumped off the dock; parents called for them to come back to eat dinner.
    It would all have been so ordinary if it hadn’t been for the End Times hanging like a sword over our heads.
    The first part of the night’s official entertainment was the episode of National Geographic’s Doomsday Preppers that featured the Austins. It was called “You Said It Was Non-Lethal,” and in it Rick and Jane describe their decision to flee suburbia after their neighborhood’s economic ruin—to the point that some nearby single-family homes were being shared by four and five families and Jane was carjacked while leaving work.
    Watching the episode, I felt a little hurt on behalf of the pair: the tone of the show was impressed—by the preppers’ ingenuity and the genius of their great hidden garden full of food—but it was also very clearly poking fun at them. Jane came across as wild-eyed and manic, showing off a hygienic invention in case toilet paper is no longer available in the future: a pump-action garden sprayer filled with an herbal tisane and called a “heinie hydrant.” Rick and Jane were shown in goggles, thick rubber gloves, and respirators, making a Mace-like spray out of extremely hot peppers from their garden; then weeping and spitting and hacking when their protection proved insufficient. At the end of the episode, the couple was given a grade of 89 out of 100 for preparedness and a twenty-month initial survival time, which, I think, made the onscreen Rick a little sad. I don’t know whether the Austins had registered the ridicule in the way they had been depicted, though if they had, I have a hard time understanding their screening the episode for a group of people who admired them.
    Doomsday Preppers was followed by a feature film: 2018’s Death of a Nation, by Dinesh D’Souza, a work whose promotional materials featured an image of Abraham Lincoln’s face split with Donald Trump’s, the man least like him in temperament and policy ever to set foot in the White House.
    The film’s premise is that, just as Democrats worked against Lincoln, they are now working to retard the social progress represented by Donald Trump. When we reached the part presenting Adolf Hitler and the Nazis as liberals—“this is done by the do-gooders . . . the people who want to improve society”—I sat in the viewing tent surrounded by angry survivalists, swarmed by mosquitoes, and felt my grasp of reason and history assaulted.
    And as the spectacle proceeded, I found language for the questions that had been growing in me all day. What in the world did right-wing conspiracy theories have to do with preparing for disaster? What was the purpose of this exhibition of baseless propaganda? I looked around me, but the faces I saw were rapt: Why did it seem that I was the only person who saw how incredibly stupid this film was?
    My loneliness drifted into fear when I imagined what would happen if my poker face slipped and the preppers could see all the disdainful liberal thoughts bouncing around in my head.
    At a certain point, something began to seem more wrong with the film than merely its lies. The music was pompous and loud, but the dramatization of Hitler and Eva Braun’s suicides took place with no explanation, as though it were an old-time silent movie. D’Souza was depicted onscreen first during a reenactment of his childhood in India; then as the adult D’Souza in New York City, speaking gravely. This is when it became obvious that some of the strangeness of the film was due to a technical problem: the spoken track was missing entirely, and only the background music was playing. D’Souza just flapped his lips. This felt appropriate.
    I left before the volunteers resolved these difficulties, trudging with my windup flashlight through the darkness to my campsite. I had set myself up between the tiny one-person tent of a man named Buddy, a construction worker from New Jersey who would later show me his femur-length machete, and the larger tent of a middle-aged man named Troy and his three bearded sons. Troy and Sons had a campsite so elaborate—with tables and chairs and a gas grill and fancy outdoor cots and lanterns—that I envied them. They were playing cards and eating filet mignon under golden lamplight. We spoke briefly, but all I wanted was to be alone, to let my pretenses fall away and read my goddamn poetry by flashlight. Once inside my own tent, I began shaking with relief after the long day of pent-up anxiety—that of being recognized and called out for the prepper imposter I had, this day, become aware that I was.
    6.
    All things are dissolved to their center by their cause, and, in the universal miracle, petty and particular miracles disappear.
    The campsite was loud, and it was impossible to sleep given the inadequate pad beneath me, the giant ants crawling over my hands and neck, and my neighbors on both sides chatting away happily: What’s the diff between kerosene and propane? I heard. I got some extra steak if you want, I heard. My credit has been froze for three years, I heard. Something way off in the woods screamed girlishly and either Troy or a Son of Troy grunted “Fox” in explanation. Raise. Call. Fold. They were playing poker. But the thrill in the blood from the screaming fox made me think of emergencies, of Rick and Jane in their armed 360-degree eagles’ aerie in their overgrown Garden of Eden, with the chicks and coffee plants in the hidden greenhouse, and of what they would do if civilization really were blown to smithereens. It went against everything I knew about the essential altruism of humanity to imagine one of those people taking a potshot at some bewildered hiker who had gone up the wrong road. How terribly lonely it would be for Rick and Jane waiting out the apocalypse with their animals.
    I wondered what exactly could bring a person to that point where they were willing to hole up and just stop caring for their fellow man. One thing I do know about humans is that the stories we tell about ourselves are the people we become. And the American narrative of macho self-reliance, which the preppers had been preaching all day, is an extremely old story; it is, in fact, one of the oldest stories of this hemisphere, emerging out of the moral gymnastics it took for ostensible Christians to sail across the Atlantic and commit acts of genocide, rape, and war against other human beings in order to allow themselves to enslave them and to seize and control land that was never their own. These new Americans needed a way to frame their actions as heroic and inevitable, and they found it in the narrative of the noble frontiersman, the solitary figure pitched against the exigencies of unpredictable nature. This type existed before Robinson Crusoe, notably in real-life survival tales told by captured, enslaved, or castaway men and women; but it was Daniel Defoe’s 1719 novel—about a seventeenth-century slaver capsized and stranded for twenty-eight years on an island near the Orinoco River, in South America—that solidified the specimen into an archetype. It’s no accident that the book is counted among the first English novels: it is a work of purest fiction—as fictional as Dinesh D’Souza’s movie, though both were packaged as documentaries.
    It is easy to be intoxicated by Robinson Crusoe, the character, even if one sees, through twenty-first-century eyes, the book’s broken moral compass. In his extreme emotional continence, inventiveness, almost impossible industry, he is the pinnacle of self-reliance. The reader—wooed by these virtues, which we have been told repeatedly are the height of manliness—cares deeply about Crusoe’s plight. We read anxiously of his parrot, his struggles with gunpowder, the way he slowly builds a miniature England on the island he makes his.
    And it is easy in all this wonder to forget that Crusoe’s predicament began with a mission to bring slaves back to the New World; he was an unapologetic murderer of the island’s cannibals; he imposed his language and religion on his young slave, Friday. Crusoe reappeared by other names in later fictions: in the stories about the historical figures Daniel Boone and Davy Crockett, who both became elevated to legend through folklore; in James Fenimore Cooper’s Leatherstocking Tales, returning as Natty Bumppo, aka Hawkeye, aka Leatherstocking, aka Deerslayer. Bumppo was also called La Longue Carabine—being a manly man, of course his rifle had to be enormous. Out of the West came an equivalently violent gunslinger: a type that was taciturn, competent, and living beyond the scope of social systems. John Wayne; Cormac McCarthy’s characters. In these pages in September 1968, Larry McMurtry wrote: “Cowboys are romantics, extreme romantics, and ninety-nine out of a hundred of them are sentimental to the core.” (This tracks with the preppers at camp. Although ostensibly preparing for the future, they were mostly concerned with the monsters of former eras—nuclear war or the loss of the electrical grid—not the far more monstrous contemporary threat of climate change ending all human life.)
    In non-fiction form, this romantic strain metamorphosed into the peculiar, homegrown utopian philosophy of transcendentalism, which gave flesh-and-blood Americans a codification of the laws of manhood. A notable inspiration for preppers, and a foundational text for the kind of libertarians who read, is Ralph Waldo Emerson’s 1841 essay “Self-Reliance.”
    In my tent, I pulled the work up on my phone and slowly reread it.
    Emerson was still a relatively young man of thirty-eight when he published the essay, and it’s so full of passionate disdain that I have a hard time reading it in anything but a Holden Caulfield voice. But this is unfair. “Self-Reliance” is a profoundly poetic work, strange and circuitous, full of startling imagery and chockablock with aphorisms so constantly recycled in American daily life that a reader can feel déjà vu in encountering the full text for the first time. Emerson’s essay holds up the self as the bedrock from which all other authority rises. Those who view Emerson as a libertarian prototype cite his glorification of the individual, as when he says, “The only right is what is after my constitution, the only wrong what is against it”; his opposition to institutions like government and religion; and his idea that community is a distraction. But I think this distills Emerson’s argument into something far smaller than its actual, and truly gigantic, oddness. Emerson’s argument is less libertarian than it is anarchic. He is not after the deification of the self—self as sun around which the planets of other people must orbit—but rather the radical de-emphasis of the institutions that bind and constrict an individual’s true use and purpose. Emerson’s philosophy is the opposite of the libertarian celebration of greed and selfishness and social Darwinism, the ideology’s fixation on personal freedom to the detriment of social security or collective advancement: Emerson posits a sort of Buddhist attention to the moment and awareness so deep it calls into question the structures that inhibit social change, the very things that lead to inequality. Self-reliance is not the same thing as self-interest.
    7.
    Society everywhere is in conspiracy against the manhood of every one of its members.
    I was bleary from sleeplessness, smelly from not wanting to go into the showers used by a few hundred other souls. I ate with glum slowness; I had not talked to anyone for longer than a few minutes in over forty-eight hours, and my solitude was wearing.
    The day before, I had been so gladdened by John Moody that I nearly ran to the first class of the day—his discussion of elderberries. He quoted Pliny the Elder, Hippocrates, and Hans Christian Andersen. He explained that the Count from Sesame Street had a historical basis: in medieval times vampires were thought to have OCD, and if you put elderberries on your windowsills, any vampires would be so entranced by counting them that they wouldn’t come into your house. He so beautifully extolled the endless medical and diet-related benefits of elderberries that I was seduced into believing that all people with even ten square feet of soil should be growing them. (I bought his book, and back at home, I ordered elderberry plants.)
    Then I went on a “Wild Edible Survival” foraging walk with Richard Cleveland of the Earth School in nearby Hendersonville: we moved a few feet down the road as a mass of sixty or seventy people and plucked and sampled sassafras, plantain (nature’s Benadryl), dandelion, sour grass, and violet.
    At “Concealed Carry and Defensive Shooting,” the instructor, David Stutts, talked about “playing with guns,” and showed a video in which a child who looked to be under the age of twelve shot at a silhouette, from a table, as though he were in a restaurant. It filled me with nausea and grief; why should children be taught to kill other humans? Stutts also said that after homeowners had incapacitated robbers or looters by shooting them in the legs, and the malefactors were on the floor, bleeding, the vigilante homeowners could decide for themselves whether to wait for the police or just “finish the job.” He made it clear with a big clownish wink what he would do.
    “How to Build a Medical Kit” was presented by the Skinny Medic, a boyish paramedic who had named himself when he weighed 120 pounds following a high dose of prednisone. Now that he was healthy, he joked that he should be called the Dad Bod Medic. He listed what ought to be in a medical supply kit: headlamp, box of gloves, shears and hemostat, Betadine or iodine, saline flush, superglue, horse tack, Ace wraps, Combat Application Tourniquet, stretch gauze, plastic bag to seal chest wounds, Mylar space blanket, generic pain meds, and so on. This felt deeply helpful; my fingers ached from taking notes.
    Thunder sounded overhead. The skies darkened, and a very light rain drizzled down. Black flies descended with the rain and began to bite.
    At my next class, “Primitive Wilderness Survival,” I learned how to go “beyond prepping to recognize and utilize the resources in nature”: how to find water from the source and build a debris shelter. The instructor joked about his worst night in a shelter: “I slept like a baby—I cried all night and pooped my pants.” On to the Old Grouch’s “Simple and Quick Shelters,” where I learned how to make a different kind of shelter out of a poncho.
    My last class of the day was “Psychological Warfare.” The instructor was a super-fit black man named Hakim Isler, whose movie-star charisma made sense when I learned that he had been on Naked and Afraid and other survivalist television shows; he calls himself the Black MacGyver. He, too, was former military, from the SERE—or Survival, Escape, Resistance, and Evasion—school, a combat veteran, and a fourth-degree black belt in To-Shin Do, which had led him to write a book called Ninja Survival.
    Isler took us through the idea behind psychological operations, or psyops, which he learned when he was in MISO, or military information support operations. He spoke of Maslow’s hierarchy of needs, the five tenets of survival (there’s always an agenda, know what makes you tick, psyops is a two-way street, take notes, be flexible and open to change), and the four strategies of the field (fortify, align, divide, and overcome).
    I began to think that perhaps Isler was himself here to engage in psyops—to discover what makes preppers tick, to track their psychology, to understand the needs and weaknesses of this community, with the ultimate aim of somehow using that knowledge. Perhaps this class was a way of hiding in plain sight, being so brazen about his presence that nobody would ever suspect him of having an agenda. I thrilled to the idea; I felt, for the first time since the disillusionment of the day before, that there might be someone in this place who wasn’t a libertarian. Perhaps I wasn’t as lonely in my politics as I had felt. Or perhaps I was losing my mind.
    8.
    The doctrine of hatred must be preached as the counteraction of the doctrine of love when that pules and whines.
    Another sad dinner of PB&J and oranges, and back into the night to hear the keynote speaker. I needed all the resilience I could muster. The speaker was a man named Curtis Bowers, whose films, Agenda: Grinding America Down and Agenda 2: Masters of Deceit, tracked (to quote Prepper Camp material) the
    history of the liberal, deep state, communist party agenda, to fundamentally change America to a communist country from within. The people behind this Agenda had a very detailed, 50 year plan, to destroy America, and they have achieved almost all of their goals from the 1960’s to today. Come to our Key Note Address to find out how we can save this country from the liberal socialist Globalist agenda.
    There was almost too much to dislike in this description, beyond the fact that the word “globalist” has long been an anti-Semitic dog whistle. I knew I would have the urge to flee, so I planted myself in the center of the audience, where I would be surrounded by people eating up this bullshit and would have to remain seated until the end.
    Curtis Bowers came out. He was a mostly bald man hiding his head under a baseball cap, a former Republican state representative in Idaho, the owner of fondue restaurants, and the father of nine homeschooled children. “Doing my part to populate the earth,” he joked, to applause.
    He talked about reading the 1958 book The Naked Communist and realizing that the Communists had a long-term plan to destroy the “culture of morality” of America and to get people to “accept homosexuality and feminism.” He said in a voice rich with sadness that he couldn’t take his boys to Walmart because the covers of magazines show what used to be considered pornography.
    Other notions Curtis Bowers promulgated that night were: That the Communists planned, as a part of their agenda, to destroy “beautiful” art, meaning figurative art, and to institute abstract art in its stead. That Senator Joseph McCarthy “did not destroy a single person’s life.” That public-school teachers are trying to indoctrinate students with Communism.
    At the end of the talk, Bowers got a standing ovation.
    I steamed back to my tent and was kept awake by the ants, the night birds, and the neighbors, who were having a giant party at a campfire. I would have attended if I hadn’t been too frightened of being inadvertently shot by a gun hoarder who’d had too many beers.
    9.
    Every man discriminates between the voluntary acts of his mind, and his involuntary perceptions, and knows that to his involuntary perceptions a perfect faith is due.
    Sunday morning came cool and sunny. I ate my granola with almond milk and packed my rental car with a glad heart. The insomnia and constant orange-alert-level anxiety were wearing on me, and I had decided to run away to a hotel in Greenville after the day’s sessions, to luxuriate in a pool and a soft bed and order room service. I would enjoy the benefits of modern society for as long as shit and fan remained far from me. As I was rinsing out my bowl, I heard an electric crackle and looked up to see two police cars rolling through the grounds.
    Someone’s in trouble, I thought. Then, in one of the more surreal moments of my life, I watched them stop beside my rental car. One cop got out with a hand on his holster. “This car’s been reported stolen. You steal this car?” he said. No no no no no, I absolutely did not, I told him. I showed him the Hertz rental agreement.
    All around me, preppers peeped out of their tents and pickup trucks to look at the cops, then at me, that weird lady who came to survivalist camp all alone, who kept herself quiet and apart, who had now invited cops into a camp for a group of people who had, let’s say, a fraught relationship with governmental authority. I thought of the weapons they surely had hidden in their cars and campsites, how so many of those were probably untraceable if not totally illegal. One of the policemen called dispatch to try to figure out what was going on. Someone in Atlanta, he was told, had reported that her boyfriend had stolen her car. I said that I wasn’t in Atlanta, I don’t have a boyfriend, I have a husband in Florida, and I’d been parked there since Friday morning. “She has, we’ve seen her!” one of the neighbors yelled across the way. OnStar had tracked my rental car down and disabled it remotely; no matter what, I was stuck until everything played out. One of the police officers was Sergeant Jeff Smith of the Polk County sheriff’s office, a handsome blond man with an athletic build who was courteous and kind. I grew a little crush on him, but that may have just been Stockholm syndrome. Jeff and I chatted between his bouts of calling here and there, Atlanta, dispatch, the cop who’d received the original call. Nearby, tent after tent was disassembled, cars rolled away, men speed-walked up the hill, fleeing the proximity of the law. Troy, in the next campsite over, heard me say that I was a writer, and his face darkened; then he and his sons took off with nary a word to me.
    Three hours passed. I missed the Sunday Christian service in the field, which would have been lovely; I’m a fan of collective action of many kinds. I missed the classes I had wanted to take that morning: “Undercover Soccer Mom,” “Nuclear, Biological, and Chemical Defense,” “Escape from Restraints.” How ridiculous it all was. Here I stood (a good liberal!) among the few attendees at Prepper Camp glad to pay hefty taxes for such agents of the nanny state as police officers, and yet I was the one who had somehow found herself squirming under the nanny state’s attention. As far as the sergeant could tell, the mess-up was entirely Hertz’s fault: likely some functionary had mistyped my car’s VIN or license plate number. OnStar turned my car back on at last. The policemen drove off. Later, instead of apologizing, Hertz put me on a list of people banned from renting cars in the United States, for neglecting to report my car as stolen.
    After the cops left, I felt vulnerable, the object of the intense curiosity of the remaining preppers at camp. I couldn’t bear the weight of their suspicion, and I was so weary I knew my shell would break under questioning. I had a vision of myself being hauled before a kangaroo court presided over by Rick Austin. Passing under the radar had been hard. Now that I had inadvertently brought the pigs to their turf, I did not feel entirely safe. Before the police cars’ dust cloud blew away, I too zoomed off, down the mountain, returning to the glories of civilization for as long as we still have it.
    10.
    But now we are a mob.
    I was terribly sad. I had found my people, perhaps, but I had not found my tribe.
    It should not have been a surprise to me—though it was—how rarely actual facts were invoked at Prepper Camp: instead I had heard a great deal of fear mitigated by practical-seeming ideas, lots of baseless venom spat in the direction of imagined liberals, but almost no science to give weight to any assertions, no analysis of the larger state of the world, no evidence of statistical knowledge. Survivalists had revealed themselves to be romantics. Prepper Camp was a castle built on emotion: fear of the inchoate other was so great that the survivalists felt justified in being prepared to kill other humans to protect their material goods.
    But scientists and historians who study catastrophes for a living have long known that there is, in fact, very little antisocial behavior that takes place after disasters. Rebecca Solnit’s extraordinary book A Paradise Built in Hell describes in great detail the collective sense of “immersion in the moment and solidarity with others” that follows large-scale calamities. The common person rises to the situation to help other people, and there can be a profound experience of well-being, inventiveness, and flexibility. In fact, the worst effects in the aftermath of disasters come when institutions try to impose top-down organization, as the military might. The presumption of mass chaos, looting, murders, rapes—this comes from something disaster scientists call “elite panic,” when people in positions of power fear the loss of their power and so overreact in violent ways. Solnit quotes the sociologist Kathleen Tierney’s description of the phenomenon:
    fear of social disorder; fear of poor, minorities and immigrants; obsession with looting and property crime; willingness to resort to deadly force; and actions taken on the basis of rumor.
    Elite panic on behalf of white conservatives led to a vast increase in prepping during Barack Obama’s presidency; there was a downtick in interest after Donald Trump entered the White House—ironic, given the comparative risks of a catastrophic event then and now. Trump has made the Environmental Protection Agency into an auctioneer of public lands, which has in turn rapidly undone commonsense regulation. Not to mention that with his deregulation and outright looting of the environment in the interest of privatizing public wealth, he has pushed the Doomsday Clock much closer to midnight. But survivalism, as it exists now in America, is not rational. It is emotional. It is the twisting of hypermasculine fear into a semblance of preparedness and rationality.
    I lay in my hotel bed in Greenville, finally clean, and began to feel a strange and terrible sadness for the people I had left on the mountain. The majority of them had military backgrounds. I thought of how they had learned in the service to be powerful, effective, competent with weapons; I thought of their leaving the military and returning to a world where those virtues were far less valuable, even sometimes scorned. How strange it must be to go from the battlefield, always on high alert, capable of killing a fellow human, back to society, where people walked around nakedly vulnerable. Our support for veterans has never been strong, and it’s worsening rapidly. It must be alienating to feel devalued, to have to struggle to retain the kind of self-worth the military had built up in you, after you have given a great deal to your country. You start to believe that institutions have failed you. And so you begin to obsess over the end of society. You stock up on guns because you’ve been trained to believe that guns can protect you, and while you’re at it, you stock up on food and water and other things. You’ve become a prepper. You begin to imagine the end of society—which you see replicated so often in zombie films, television shows, disaster flicks, and dystopian literature that you can imagine it vividly—and perhaps you start to long for the apocalypse. It would solve so much of what makes you uncomfortable about the contemporary world.
    “Liberals are going to be one of the first ones to die,” Rick Austin said when he was featured in a jokey, five-minute Daily Show segment about liberal preppers. “Maybe in the apocalypse, there won’t be conservatives and liberals, there will just be people that survive,” the correspondent, Desi Lydic, noted hopefully. Austin nodded and said, “Exactly. And dead liberals.” (Then again, he also said, “Hillary Clinton is running the largest crime syndicate in America.”) There had been so much bitterness and fury toward the left at Prepper Camp that I began to wonder now whether preppers were actually hungry for a time of upheaval so that they could finally watch liberals get their comeuppance.
    But then I saw, to my horror, an uglier truth: that I was no better than my prepper brethren. And that because of my hypocrisy, I was probably even worse.
    Perhaps doomsday libertarians do secretly long for a chance to rid the earth of people who threaten their supremacy; but there is something equally anarchic in me that longs for society to break so that we can rebuild it to be kinder, more generous, more equitable.

    Deep down, perhaps I am a prepper because I believe that the only way we are going to pry the world’s wealth out of the greedy, grasping hands of the billionaires who are willfully killing the environment is through a total collapse of the status quo. Perhaps I am a prepper because I have had enough: I am goddamn ready for the guillotines.

    Maybe on both sides this secret death wish is born of an error, the conflation of society and the social fabric, which are in fact separate phenomena: society is made of the institutions that work together to ease human life; the social fabric is the beautiful anarchic bedrock of community and goodwill between human strangers. It is true that society is in deep trouble, but the social fabric is innate and strong, and this should be taken into consideration when preparing for a possible disaster. I was making the same mistake as people who had a vision of the world turned 180 degrees from my own. I was discounting the social fabric. All along, I had been making my survival preparations in a state of isolated intellectualization. I didn’t trust myself to make a pathetic little fire in front of other humans who knew how to do so better than I did. Faced with preppers who didn’t look or talk like me, I had become suspicious and afraid. My survivalism before Prepper Camp was revealed to be a paltry thing; it did not come from a community or out of a larger collective effort.
    In the months after Prepper Camp, I have come to believe that liberals need to begin preparing in earnest for disaster situations. Libertarians and radical conservatives seem to own disaster preparedness, but liberals and progressives, equally made of tender, breakable flesh and bone, are just as much subject to the whims of nature. We need to use our knowledge, to apply to disaster preparations an understanding of science and fact; we need to develop real and actionable survivalism so that regular people can be as useful as possible in catastrophic situations. Everyday citizens should be taking classes in emergency health care. They should learn to store food and forage and make shelters. Every household should have stocks of food that will last for at least two weeks, the means to find water, an escape plan, a bug-out bag.
    Individual action is good. Even better would be to counter individual self-obsession, to override the pervasive libertarian impulse to concentrate solely on the needs and desires of the self. Americans need to wake up to the necessity of immediate, powerful collective action. Self-reliance works only in stable civilizations, in which angry individualists like those I met at Prepper Camp have the leisure to concentrate on their own needs, to pretend that the concerns of the larger world simply don’t exist. I am here to tell you that we absolutely need the right-wing preppers’ decades of deep thought, their anxieties transformed into the everyday mastery of survival. Beyond learning from their mastery, we need to find a way to pull the loudest, angriest, most militant individualists into the collective, to make them understand the necessity of the common good.
    We have pushed ourselves beyond the point in the human narrative when we can worry only about ourselves. We have fucked ourselves into a massive die-off, killing half the world’s species. California is on fire, Australia is on fire; we are already suffering, with displaced populations and major failures to the electrical grid. Doomsday is here now. We need to act collectively, we need to act fast, if all humans—libertarian or progressive or the hapless masses of the unprepared—are going to have a chance to survive this warming world.

    Lauren Elizabeth Groff, 41, grew up in Cooperstown in upstate New York where as a little girl and teenager she attended Christian church services on Sundays. In 2006, she married her Amherst College sweetheart Clayton Kallman, a tall Jewish guy from Gainesville, in an interfaith wedding service presided over by a Christian pastor.  

    Friday, March 6, 2020

    A Long Night of Climate in Literature -- The planet strikes back // Eine Lange Nacht vom Kilma in der Literatur -- Der Planet schlagt zuruck

    Eine Lange Nacht vom Klima in der LiteraturDer Planet schlägt zurück

    ENGLISH TRANSLATION HERE AND
    GERMAN TEXT BELOW (scroll down)

    Von Jane Tversted und Martin Zähringer

    A Long Night of Climate in Literature -- The planet strikes back

    By Jane Tversted and Martin Zähringer
    Listen to article





     
    Image taken from the ISS on the eye of a hurricane. [Getty Images / NASA]

    Hurricane Florence heading for the US East Coast. (Getty Images / NASA)
    Climate is not only a matter for politics, but also for literature: "Climate Fiction" is a literary trend that has been reflecting and thinking about the challenges, fears and hopes of the climate debate for years.
    For literature, the climate is not only a challenge of a technical nature - how do I tell something so complex? -, it also combines the most diverse genres and forms of expression to create a broad literary field. The American journalist Dan Bloom described it in 2007 as climate fiction or CliFi.
    For two of their best experts, Axel Goodbody and Adeline Johns-Putra, climate fiction is: "A kind of therapeutic space where the collective fear of the Anthropocene is expressed, shared and worked through."
    Literary protest against inadequate climate policy
    Climate fiction, according to a narrower definition, is the literature that acknowledges and addresses man-made climate change - in some cases long before the debate on it had reached the mainstream. But not only in the sense of a deterrent and frightening development, but, as Goodbody and Johns-Putra write: "With its potential for encouraging reflection and motivation, CliFi can also be seen as a vehicle for protest against the lack of climate policy".
    Axel Goodbody & Adeline Johns-Putra: "Cli-Fi. A Companion" (English)
    Peter Lang, Oxford 2018
    236 pages, 37,10 Euro
    Read the introduction here.
    Axel Goodbody was Professor of German and European Culture in Bath, England, until his retirement. He has published widely on literary representations of nature and the environment. He is also the leading expert on German climate fiction.

    An elderly gentleman in a jacket, glasses and thinning hair. He smiles, has raised his hand gesticulating and seems to be speaking into a microphone in front of him. (private)The Germanist and expert for climate fiction Axel Goodbody. (in private)
    Goodbody recognizes in climate fiction a kind of second phase, which follows the environmental literature of the seventies and eighties: "Climate change actually only became a public issue in the late 80's. But it wasn't until around 2000 that several works came out," says Goodbody, "and it wasn't until around 2010 that well-known writers came out on the subject.
    Climate researchers as heroes - and as shady characters
    The heroes of the narrative literature on climate change are often the climate researchers, for example in Barbara Kingsolver's "The Flight Behaviour of Butterflies" from 2014: Here the emerging scientist is a fighter for the good cause and is able to share his knowledge with his less knowledgeable environment.
    However, climate researchers do not always get off lightly and sometimes they tend to become anti-heroes of their failure. For example in the novel "The Prophecy" by Sven Böttcher, published in 2012. Climate science is not described here as an enterprise for saving the world, but rather as a marketplace determined by interests with very human and sometimes criminal actors.
    In his 2010 climate change novel "Solar", the British author Ian McEwan also focuses on the figure of the dubious scientist who develops into a climate capitalist who is only interested in his own advantage.
    Interview with Ian Mc Ewan about his novel "Solar":


    Editorially recommended external content


    I agree that external content may be displayed to me. This means that personal data will be transferred to third party platforms. Deutschlandradio has no influence on this. You can read more about this in our privacy policy. You can deactivate the display at any time.



    Science education as a positive narrative: Alice im Klimaland
    McEwan researched the technical aspects of his novel at the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research, among other places," recalls Margret Boysen, who studied geology and is head of the artists' programme there. Margret Boysen is also an author and makes climate science itself the subject of a novel: "Alice, Climate Change and the Cat Zeta".
    Margret Boysen: "Alice, climate change and the cat Zeta".
    Edition Rugerup, Berlin 2016
    278 pages, 21,90 Euro
    Boysen tells the story of Alice, a schoolgirl from Berlin, who visits the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research on Telegrafenberg with her class and accidentally ends up inside a super computer. Behind the computer screens she experiences the world of climate models, but with a few fantastic additions.

    A blonde woman in black clothes looks diagonally upwards into the camera, smiling. (Wolfgang Schmidt/Margret Boysen)The geologist and author Margret Boysen, artistic director at the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research. (Wolfgang Schmidt/Margret Boysen)
    "The real motivation for the book, which began as early as 2010, when people started sending death threats to climate scientists," says Boysen. "And the mood was so anti-scientific that I thought you had to take up the cudgels for the science, how exciting it is, what strict quality controls the scientists actually subject themselves to.
    From climate activism to ecodictatorship?
    But not only climate science, but also climate activism is taken up in climate fiction. For example, in the first eco-thriller in German: "Palmers Krieg" by Dirk C. Fleck, published in 1992, the book describes the hijacking of an oil tanker from Tokyo to New York: an oil manager in an elevated position gets a fatal illness, goes into a state of self-discovery and changes sides. He wants to make sure that the world is informed about the dangers of the greenhouse effect and the role of the oil industry, and that governments take countermeasures against climate change.

    Dirk C. Fleck is sitting on a sofa. (Martin Zähringer)The author and journalist Dirk C. Fleck. (Martin Zähringer)
    The motive of ecoterrorism has a real model in the so-called "Forest Wars" of the 80s and 90s on the American West Coast, when militant environmental groups like "Earth First" fought against deforestation with acts of sabotage. The American author T.C. Boyle also deals with this radical form of activism in his novel "Ein Freund der Erde" (A Friend of the Earth), published in 2000 (2001 in German). In both Fleck and Boyle, however, concern for the planet comes into conflict with concern for humanity: "To be a friend of the Earth, one must become an enemy of man," as Boyle puts it.

    Tribes drift in the water in front of a Pacific Lumber Company plant. (Getty Images / Andrew Lichtenstein)The Pacific Lumber Company was involved in deforesting parts of the Headwaters Forest in 1998 (Getty Images / Andrew Lichtenstein)
    T.C. Boyle: "A Friend of the Earth"
    Hanser, Munich 2001
    360 pages, 19,90 Euro
    In 1993, one year after "Palmer's War", Fleck published the novel "GO! The Ecodictatorship". Here what remained in "Palmer's War" the wish of a radical eco-warrior is carried out: In 2020, a virus attack paralyzes the entire infrastructure of global capitalism and a twelve-member ecorate takes over. The ecodictatorship is the result of a last minute panic and basically the description of a totalitarian ideology, an eco-fascism that could prevail in the absence of a rational environmental policy.
    Since then, the CO2 concentration and the warming of the climate have increased significantly, as Fleck points out: "You can compare every value we measured then with the one we have today and everything has gotten ten times worse.
    Schellnhuber: Science must shake up
    And Professor Hans Joachim Schellnhuber, climate system researcher and founder of the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research, observes: "Everyone is slowly coming to the conclusion: Shit - we're all going to die.

    The German climate researcher and director of the Institute for Climate Impact Research in Potsdam, founded in 1992, Hans Joachim Schellnhuber, sits at a desk full of books (dpa-Zentralbild)The German climate researcher and director of the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research Hans Joachim Schellnhuber (dpa-Zentralbild)
    Schellnhuber is also the author of an autobiographically narrated non-fiction book entitled "Selbstverbrennung" (self-immolation). The book reconstructs the history of climate science, which is particularly exciting because the story always takes place in a dramatic confrontation with politics and economic interests.
    Hans Joachim Schellnhuber: "Self-immolation. The fatal triangular relationship between climate, humans and carbon".
    C. Bertelsmann, Munich 2015
    784 pages, 29,99 Euro
    Schellnhuber sees a decisive responsibility for social education in climate science itself: "Because of my deeper insight into things, I am responsible for presenting the risk warnings, if necessary, in such a penetrating and dramatic manner until they have an effect.
    Is climate research becoming more radical?
    Writer Ilija Trojanow also did research at a climate institute for his book "Eistau" (Ice Dew), which was published by Hanser in 2011. The novel tells the tragedy of a glaciologist who is becoming increasingly radicalised. A tendency that is confirmed today:
    "You can clearly see that the people of Potsdam are now beginning to ask the question of the system, whereas ten years ago they thought they could solve the problem by means of regulations, by a more flexible approach and by a more flexible approach.

    A blonde woman in black clothes looks diagonally upwards into the camera, smiling. (Wolfgang Schmidt/Margret Boysen)The geologist and author Margret Boysen, artistic director at the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research. (Wolfgang Schmidt/Margret Boysen)
    "The real motivation for the book, which began as early as 2010, when people started sending death threats to climate scientists," says Boysen. "And the mood was so anti-scientific that I thought you had to take up the cudgels for the science, how exciting it is, what strict quality controls the scientists actually subject themselves to.
    From climate activism to ecodictatorship?
    But not only climate science, but also climate activism is taken up in climate fiction. For example, in the first eco-thriller in German: "Palmers Krieg" by Dirk C. Fleck, published in 1992, the book describes the hijacking of an oil tanker from Tokyo to New York: an oil manager in an elevated position gets a fatal illness, goes into a state of self-discovery and changes sides. He wants to make sure that the world is informed about the dangers of the greenhouse effect and the role of the oil industry, and that governments take countermeasures against climate change.

    Dirk C. Fleck is sitting on a sofa. (Martin Zähringer)The author and journalist Dirk C. Fleck. (Martin Zähringer)
    The motive of ecoterrorism has a real model in the so-called "Forest Wars" of the 80s and 90s on the American West Coast, when militant environmental groups like "Earth First" fought against deforestation with acts of sabotage. The American author T.C. Boyle also deals with this radical form of activism in his novel "Ein Freund der Erde" (A Friend of the Earth), published in 2000 (2001 in German). In both Fleck and Boyle, however, concern for the planet comes into conflict with concern for humanity: "To be a friend of the Earth, one must become an enemy of man," as Boyle puts it.

    Tribes drift in the water in front of a Pacific Lumber Company plant. (Getty Images / Andrew Lichtenstein)The Pacific Lumber Company was involved in deforesting parts of the Headwaters Forest in 1998 (Getty Images / Andrew Lichtenstein)
    T.C. Boyle: "A Friend of the Earth"
    Hanser, Munich 2001
    360 pages, 19,90 Euro
    In 1993, one year after "Palmer's War", Fleck published the novel "GO! The Ecodictatorship". Here what remained in "Palmer's War" the wish of a radical eco-warrior is carried out: In 2020, a virus attack paralyzes the entire infrastructure of global capitalism and a twelve-member ecorate takes over. The ecodictatorship is the result of a last minute panic and basically the description of a totalitarian ideology, an eco-fascism that could prevail in the absence of a rational environmental policy.
    Since then, the CO2 concentration and the warming of the climate have increased significantly, as Fleck points out: "You can compare every value we measured then with the one we have today and everything has gotten ten times worse.
    Schellnhuber: Science must shake up
    And Professor Hans Joachim Schellnhuber, climate system researcher and founder of the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research, observes: "Everyone is slowly coming to the conclusion: Shit - we're all going to die.

    The German climate researcher and director of the Institute for Climate Impact Research in Potsdam, founded in 1992, Hans Joachim Schellnhuber, sits at a desk full of books (dpa-Zentralbild)The German climate researcher and director of the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research Hans Joachim Schellnhuber (dpa-Zentralbild)
    Schellnhuber is also the author of an autobiographically narrated non-fiction book entitled "Selbstverbrennung" (self-immolation). The book reconstructs the history of climate science, which is particularly exciting because the story always takes place in a dramatic confrontation with politics and economic interests.
    Hans Joachim Schellnhuber: "Self-immolation. The fatal triangular relationship between climate, humans and carbon".
    C. Bertelsmann, Munich 2015
    784 pages, 29,99 Euro
    Schellnhuber sees a decisive responsibility for social education in climate science itself: "Because of my deeper insight into things, I am responsible for presenting the risk warnings, if necessary, in such a penetrating and dramatic manner until they have an effect.
    Is climate research becoming more radical?
    Writer Ilija Trojanow also did research at a climate institute for his book "Eistau" (Ice Dew), which was published by Hanser in 2011. The novel tells the tragedy of a glaciologist who is becoming increasingly radicalised. A tendency that is confirmed today:
    "You can clearly see that the people of Potsdam are now beginning to ask the question of the system, whereas ten years ago they thought they could solve the problem by means of regulations, by a more flexible approach and by a more flexible approach.

    Interview with Ilija Trojanow about his book 'Ice Dew' (2011):


    Editorially recommended external content


    I agree that external content may be displayed to me. This means that personal data will be transferred to third party platforms. Deutschlandradio has no influence on this. You can read more about this in our privacy policy. You can deactivate the display at any time.



    Humanity can only save itself
    The counterpart to this radicalization - the widespread refusal to listen to science - is the Viennese writer Thomas Aiginger. In his novel from 2018 entitled "State of Emergency", he lets news from outer space stir up the climate debate.
    But the punch line in Aiginger's novel is that there can be no other actor in the fight against man-made climate catastrophe than man himself. But why do many people react with defensiveness to the climate researchers and activists? Aiginger sees one cause in feelings of guilt:
    "That simply people who have now declared 20 years ago that climate change does not exist and that we can carry on as before simply cannot tolerate it when a 16-year-old girl comes along and tells them: You are to blame that my generation can no longer live like you do. I think that's hard for a lot of people to accept.
    Has climate change been deliberately covered up?
    Climate researcher Schellnhuber points to another cause of inaction besides displacement and inertia: "Of course there was indeed a controlled campaign. Of all people, the oil industry's research groups had already predicted global warming and the expected increase in CO2 with astonishing precision by the middle of the 20th century - but had not published their findings: "These results were classified and, on the contrary, the oil industry began to deliberately cast doubt on them.
    The Investigative Network Correctiv has researched current networks for business climate denial.
    The story of this missed opportunity to save the Earth is also covered by the American author Nathaniel Rich in his narrative non-fiction book "Losing Earth". Rich tells how the American government deliberately chose to ignore the information and warnings of science and environmental organisations and took the side of industrial lobbyists.
    Poems about the hurricane
    In the USA, the consequences of actively prevented climate protection are often felt above all by the black population. This was also the case when Hurricane Katrina devastated New Orleans in 2005: almost 2000 people died in the floods and due to a lack of aid, hundreds of thousands became homeless - a large proportion of them African-Americans.
    Environmental justice is a traditional theme in African American literature and poetry in the USA. There are three volumes of poetry alone that deal only with Katrina. One is by Patricia Smith, a celebrated poet in the USA: "Blood Dazzler" - Blood Blenders, nominated for the National Book Award in 2010. In it, Smith describes the fates of the victims, but she also puts herself in the hurricane itself: "Katrina" is indeed "a woman who cares," says Smith.
    Patricia Smith reads from "Blood Dazzler" (2010):


    Editorially recommended external content


    I agree that external content may be displayed to me. This means that personal data will be transferred to third party platforms. Deutschlandradio has no influence on this. You can read more about this in our privacy policy. You can deactivate the display at any time.



    Climate crisis and capitalism
    Besides describing the present and the dystopian consequences of climate change, climate fiction also deals with glimmers of hope and possible solutions. A prominent representative of this direction is the Californian Kim Stanley Robinson.
    In his climate trilogy "Science in the Capital", published in 2004-2007, the well-known science fiction author plays through how saving the Earth could take place under the sign of advanced climate change.
    Lecture by Stanley Kim Robinson: How the climate is changing society


    Editorially recommended external content


    I agree that external content may be displayed to me. This means that personal data will be transferred to third party platforms. Deutschlandradio has no influence on this. You can read more about this in our privacy policy. You can deactivate the display at any time.



    In the novel "New York 2140" published in 2017, however, all rescue attempts came too late: Several tidal waves have wreaked havoc around the world. Downtown Manhattan is 50 feet underwater. The New Yorkers have developed a kind of eco-subculture and converted the office towers into housing cooperatives.

    In the 2017 published novel "New York 2140" on the other hand, all rescue attempts came too late: Several tidal waves have wreaked havoc around the world, downtown Manhattan is 50 feet underwater. The New Yorkers have developed a kind of eco-subculture and converted the office towers into housing cooperatives. But New York is still the metropolis of finance capital and real estate speculation is flourishing in uptown Manhattan.
    Kim Stanley Robinson: "New York 2140"
    Heyne, Munich 2017
    816 pages, 16,99 Euro
    Against this background, Robinson devotes himself to the connection between the climate crisis and capitalism - and the question of what a different way of living together might look like. Among other things, he plays through the nationalization of the financial system. What may sound unrealistic today is only a question of time for Robinson:
    "As a science-fiction writer, you say: "What can't happen, won't happen. So capitalism cannot continue to expand and destroy everything, something will happen. It's not out what it will be and what it will be called, but it won't be capitalism."
    Read the full manuscript for the programme: Manuscript as PDF.
    Production of this Long Night:
     Authors: Jane Tversted and Martin Zähringer; Speakers: Sabine Arnhold, Cathlen Gawlich, Anika Mauer, Jörg Hartman, Michael Rotschopf, Lisa Hrdina; Director: Beate Ziegs; Editor: Dr. Monika Künzel; Web editing: Constantin Hühn
    About the authors:
    Jane Tversted, born in Copenhagen, has lived in Berlin since 1993. She studied German and philosophy. She translates into Danish and has been publishing features, radio plays and reports for ARD and DLF since 2012.
    Martin Zähringer, born in the Black Forest, studied New German Literature and Nordic Studies in Berlin and Copenhagen and has been working as a literary critic for print and radio since 2004. Since 2012 he has been working as a feature author together with Jane Tversted.
    The team of authors works thematically at the interfaces of art, politics and society, primarily with an international focus. Last features from their pen: "Gemeinnützige Widerstand" SWR 2019, "Climate Fiction" WDR/DLF 2018. Together with the "Climate Cultures network berlin" they will curate the 3-day "Climate Fiction Festival" in June 2020 at the Literaturhaus Berlin.

    More about the topic
    Climate Fiction & Co - Climate change as a marginal topic in German literature
    (Deutschlandfunk Culture, Reading, 09.09.2019)
    Climate-Fiction Comic "Message" - blessing and curse of artificial intelligence
    (German Radio, Corso, 04.03.2019)
    About climate change in literature - Climate Fiction
    (Deutschlandfunk, The Feature, 30.11.2018)
     
    Beitrag hören
    Aufnahme von der ISS auf das Auge eines Hurrikans. (Getty Images / NASA)

    Hurrikan Florence auf dem Weg Richtung US-Ostküste. (Getty Images / NASA)
    Das Klima beschäftigt nicht nur die Politik, sondern auch die Literatur: „Climate Fiction“ ist eine literarische Strömung, die seit Jahren die Herausforderungen, Ängste und Hoffnungen der Klima-Debatte reflektiert und weiterdenkt.
    Das Klima ist für die Literatur nicht nur eine Herausforderung technischer Art – Wie erzähle ich so etwas Komplexes? –, es verbindet auch verschiedenste Genres und Ausdrucksformen zu einem weiten literarischen Feld. Der amerikanische Journalist Dan Bloom hat es im Jahr 2007 als Climate Fiction oder auch CliFi bezeichnet.
    Für zwei ihrer besten Kenner, Axel Goodbody und Adeline Johns-Putra, ist Climate Fiction: „Eine Art von therapeutischem Raum, in dem die Kollektivangst des Anthropozän geäußert, geteilt und durchgearbeitet wird.“

    Literarischer Protest gegen mangelhafte Klimapolitik

    Climate Fiction ist nach einer engeren Definition die Literatur, die den menschengemachten Klimawandel anerkennt und thematisiert – teils lange, bevor die Debatte darum im Mainstream angekommen war. Aber nicht nur im Sinne einer abschreckenden und furchterregenden Entwicklung, sondern, wie Goodbody und Johns-Putra schreiben: „Mit ihrem Potential an ermutigender Reflexion und Motivation kann man CliFi auch als einen Träger des Protestes gegen die fehlende Klimapolitik betrachten“.
    Axel Goodbody & Adeline Johns-Putra: „Cli-Fi. A Companion“ (engl.)
    Peter Lang, Oxford 2018
    236 Seiten, 37,10 Euro
    Lesen Sie hier die Einleitung.
    Axel Goodbody war bis zu seiner Emeritierung als Professor für deutsche und europäische Kultur in Bath in England tätig. Er hat viel über literarische Repräsentationen von Natur und Umwelt publiziert. Außerdem ist er der führende Experte für die deutsche Climate Fiction.
    Ein älterer Herr mit Sakko, Brille und schütterem Haar. Er lächelt, hat die Hand gestikulierend erhoben und scheint gerade in ein Mikrofon vor ihm zu sprechen. (privat)Der Germanist und Experte für Climate Fiction Axel Goodbody. (privat)
    Goodbody erkennt in der Climate Fiction eine Art zweite Phase, die auf die Umweltliteratur der Siebziger und Achtziger folgt: „Das Thema Klimawandel ist eigentlich erst zum öffentlichen Thema geworden gegen Ende der 80er Jahre. Aber erst gegen 2000 herum kamen dann mehrere Werke heraus“, so Goodbody, „und eigentlich kamen erst bekannte Schriftsteller gegen 2010 zum Thema.“

    Klimaforscher als Helden – und als zwielichtige Gestalten

    Heldinnen und Helden der erzählenden Literatur zum Klimawandel sind oft die Klimaforscher, etwa in Barbara Kingsolvers „Das Flugverhalten der Schmetterlinge“ von 2014: Der auftretende Wissenschaftler ist hier ein Kämpfer für die gute Sache und in der Lage, seine weniger wissende Umgebung an seinem Wissen teilhaben zu lassen.
    Allerdings kommen die Klimaforscher nicht immer gut weg und geraten manchmal eher zu Antihelden ihres Versagens. Etwa im 2012 erschienenen Roman „Die Prophezeiung“ von Sven Böttcher. Die Klimawissenschaft wird hier nicht als Unternehmen der Weltrettung geschildert, sondern als von Interessen bestimmter Marktplatz mit sehr menschlichen und teils kriminellen Akteuren.
    Auch der britische Autor Ian McEwan setzt in seinem Klimawandelroman „Solar“ von 2010 auf die Figur des zwielichtigen Wissenschaftlers, der sich zu einem nur auf den eigenen Vorteil bedachten Klimakapitalisten entwickelt.
    Interview mit Ian Mc Ewan über seinen Roman „Solar“:

    Redaktionell empfohlener externer Inhalt


    Ich bin damit einverstanden, dass mir externe Inhalte angezeigt werden. Damit werden personenbezogene Daten an Drittplattformen übermittelt. Deutschlandradio hat darauf keinen Einfluss. Näheres dazu lesen Sie in unserer Datenschutzerklärung. Sie können die Anzeige jederzeit wieder deaktivieren.


    Sie können solche externen Einbettungen mit diesem Schalter wieder deaktivieren (Datenschutzerklärung).

    Wissenschaftsvermittlung als positive Erzählung: Alice im Klimaland

    Für die fachlichen Aspekte seines Romans hat McEwan unter anderem am Potsdamer Institut für Klimafolgenforschung recherchiert, erinnert sich Margret Boysen, studierte Geologin und Leiterin des dortigen Künstlerprogramms. Margret Boysen ist auch Autorin und macht die Klimawissenschaft selbst zum Subjekt eines Romans: „Alice, der Klimawandel und die Katze Zeta“.
    Margret Boysen: „Alice, der Klimawandel und die Katze Zeta“
    Edition Rugerup, Berlin 2016
    278 Seiten, 21,90 Euro
    Boysen erzählt die Geschichte der Berliner Schülerin Alice, die mit ihrer Schulklasse das Potsdam-Institut für Klimafolgenforschung auf dem Telegrafenberg besucht und dabei versehentlich im Inneren eines Superrechners landet. Hinter den Computer-Bildschirmen erlebt sie die Welt der Klimamodelle, allerdings mit ein paar fantastischen Zusätzen.
    Eine blonde Frau in schwarzer Kleidung schaut lächelnd nach schräg oben in die Kamera. (Wolfgang Schmidt/Margret Boysen)Die Geologin und Autorin Margret Boysen, künstlerische Leiterin am Potsdam-Institut für Klimafolgenforschung. (Wolfgang Schmidt/Margret Boysen)„Die eigentliche Motivation für das Buch, das begann schon 2010, als man begann Klimawissenschaftlern Morddrohungen zu schicken“, erzählt Boysen. „Und die Stimmung war so antiwissenschaftlich, dass ich gedacht habe, man muss noch mal eine richtige Lanze brechen für die Wissenschaft, wie spannend die ist, welchen strengen Qualitätskontrollen sich eigentlich die Wissenschaftler aussetzen.“

    Vom Klimaaktivismus zur Ökodiktatur?

    Aber nicht nur die Klimawissenschaft, sondern auch der Klimaaktivismus wird in der Climate Fiction aufgegriffen. So etwa im ersten Ökothriller in deutscher Sprache: „Palmers Krieg“ von Dirk C. Fleck, erschienen 1992. Das Buch beschreibt die Entführung eines Öltankers von Tokio nach New York: Ein Ölmanager in gehobener Position bekommt eine tödliche Krankheit, geht in sich und wechselt die Seiten. Er will dafür sorgen, dass die Welt über die Gefahren des Treibhauseffektes und die Rolle der Ölindustrie informiert wird und dass die Regierungen Gegenmaßnahmen zum Klimawandel ergreifen.
    Dirk C. Fleck sitzt auf einem Sofa. (Martin Zähringer)Der Autor und Journalist Dirk C. Fleck. (Martin Zähringer)
    Das Motiv des Ökoterrorismus hat ein reales Vorbild in den sogenannten „Waldkriegen“ der 80er und 90er Jahre an der amerikanischen Westküste, als militante Umweltgruppen wie „Earth First“ mit Sabotageakten gegen Abholzung kämpften. Diese radikale Form des Aktivismus verarbeitet auch der amerikanische Autor T.C. Boyle in seinem im Jahr 2000 (2001 auf Deutsch) erschienenen Roman „Ein Freund der Erde“. Bei Fleck wie bei Boyle gerät aber die Sorge um den Planeten mit der um die Menschheit in Konflikt: „Denn um ein Freund der Erde zu sein, muss man zum Feind des Menschen werden“, wie es bei Boyle heißt.
    Stämme treiben vor einem Werk der Pacific Lumber Company im Wasser. (Getty Images / Andrew Lichtenstein)Die Pacific Lumber Company war beteiligt an der Abholzung Teile des Headwaters Forest im Jahr 1998. (Getty Images / Andrew Lichtenstein)
    T.C. Boyle: „Ein Freund der Erde“
    Hanser, München 2001
    360 Seiten, 19,90 Euro
    1993, ein Jahr nach „Palmers Krieg“, veröffentlichte Fleck den Roman „GO! Die Ökodiktatur“. Hier wird das vollzogen, was in „Palmers Krieg“ noch der Wunsch eines radikalen Ökokriegers geblieben ist: Im Jahr 2020 legt eine Virenattacke die gesamte Infrastruktur des globalen Kapitalismus lahm und ein zwölfköpfiger Ökorat übernimmt die Macht. Die Ökodiktatur ist das Resultat einer Torschlusspanik und im Grunde die Beschreibung einer totalitären Ideologie, ein Ökofaschismus, der sich mangels einer rationalen Umweltpolitik durchsetzen könnte.
    Seither habe sich die CO2-Konzentration und die Erwärmung des Klimas noch deutlich verschärft, wie Fleck betont: „Da können Sie jeden Wert, den wir damals gemessen haben mit dem heutigen vergleichen und alles ist zehnmal schlimmer geworden.“

    Schellnhuber: Wissenschaft muss aufrütteln

    Und Professor Hans Joachim Schellnhuber, Klimasystemforscher und Gründer des Potsdam-Institutes für Klimafolgenforschung, beobachtet: „So ganz langsam überkommt alle die Gewissheit: Scheiße – wir werden alle verrecken.“
    Der deutsche Klimaforscher und Direktor des 1992 gegründeten Institutes für Klimafolgenforschung in Potsdam, Hans Joachim Schellnhuber, sitzt an einem Schreibtisch voller Bücher (dpa-Zentralbild)Der deutsche Klimaforscher und Direktor des Potsdamer Institutes für Klimafolgenforschung Hans Joachim Schellnhuber (dpa-Zentralbild)
    Schellnhuber ist auch der Autor eines autobiografisch erzählenden Sachbuches mit dem Titel „Selbstverbrennung“. Das Buch rekonstruiert die Geschichte der Klimawissenschaften, was besonders spannend ist, weil sich die Geschichte immer in einer dramatischen Auseinandersetzung mit Politik und Wirtschaftsinteressen abspielt.
    Hans Joachim Schellnhuber: „Selbstverbrennung. Die fatale Dreiecksbeziehung zwischen Klima, Mensch und Kohlenstoff“
    C. Bertelsmann, München 2015
    784 Seiten, 29,99 Euro
    Eine entscheidende Verantwortung für gesellschaftliche Aufklärung sieht Schellnhuber bei der Klimawissenschaft selbst: „Ich bin aufgrund meiner tieferen Einsicht in die Dinge verantwortlich dafür, die Risikohinweise notfalls so penetrant und dramatisch vorzubringen, bis sie Wirkung zeigen.“

    Radikalisiert sich die Klimaforschung?

    Auch der Schriftsteller Ilija Trojanow hat für sein Buch „Eistau“, das 2011 bei Hanser erschien, an einem Klimainstitut recherchiert. Der Roman erzählt die Tragödie eines Gletscherforschers, der sich zunehmend radikalisiert. Eine Tendenz, die sich heute bestätige:
    „Man sieht ja auch ganz klar bei den Potsdamern, dass sie jetzt beginnen die Systemfrage zu stellen, während sie noch vor zehn Jahren dachten, mit ordnungspolitischen Regelungen, mit einer vernünftigen Bundesregierung, die auf ihre Empfehlungen hört, könne man die Sache wuppen, jetzt merken sie – Nee. Und ich glaube, dieser faule Klimapakt wird sie jetzt erst noch mehr radikalisieren.“
    Interview mit Ilija Trojanow über sein Buch „Eistau“ (2011):

    Redaktionell empfohlener externer Inhalt


    Ich bin damit einverstanden, dass mir externe Inhalte angezeigt werden. Damit werden personenbezogene Daten an Drittplattformen übermittelt. Deutschlandradio hat darauf keinen Einfluss. Näheres dazu lesen Sie in unserer Datenschutzerklärung. Sie können die Anzeige jederzeit wieder deaktivieren.


    Sie können solche externen Einbettungen mit diesem Schalter wieder deaktivieren (Datenschutzerklärung).

    Retten kann die Menschheit sich nur selbst

    Das Gegenstück zu dieser Radikalisierung – die verbreitete Weigerung, auf die Wissenschaft zu hören – beschäftigt den Wiener Schriftsteller Thomas Aiginger. In seinem Roman aus dem Jahr 2018 mit dem Titel „Ausnahmezustand“ lässt er Nachrichten aus dem Weltall die Klimadebatte aufmischen.
    Die Pointe in Aigingers Roman ist aber, dass es keinen anderen Akteur im Kampf gegen die menschengemachte Klimakatastrophe geben kann als den Menschen selbst. Warum aber reagieren viele Menschen mit Abwehr auf die Klima-Forscherinnen und Aktivisten? Eine Ursache sieht Aiginger in Schuldgefühlen:
    „Dass einfach Menschen, die jetzt 20 Jahre erklärt haben, den Klimawandel gibt es nicht und wir können weitermachen wie bisher, das einfach nicht vertragen, wenn da ein 16 jähriges Mädchen daherkommt und ihnen sagt: Ihr seid schuld, dass meine Generation nicht mehr so leben kann wie ihr. Ich glaube, dass das für viele Menschen schwierig zu akzeptieren ist.“

    Wurde der Klimawandel gezielt vertuscht?

    Klimaforscher Schellnhuber weist neben Verdrängung und Trägheit noch auf eine andere Ursache der Untätigkeit hin: „Es gab natürlich tatsächlich eine gesteuerte Kampagne.“ Ausgerechnet die Forschergruppen der Ölindustrie hätten schon Mitte des 20. Jahrhunderts die Erderwärmung und den zu erwartenden CO2-Anstieg erstaunlich präzise vorhergesagt – aber nicht veröffentlicht: „Diese Ergebnisse wurden klassifiziert und man begann, im Gegenteil, in der Ölindustrie ganz bewusst Zweifel zu streuen.“
    Das Investigativ-Netzwerk Correctiv hat über aktuelle Netzwerke zur geschäftsmäßigen Klimaleugnung recherchiert.
    Mit der Geschichte dieser verpassten Chance zur Rettung der Erde, befasst sich auch der amerikanische Schriftsteller Nathaniel Rich in seinem erzählenden Sachbuch „Losing Earth“. Rich berichtet darin, wie die amerikanische Regierung bewusst die Informationen und Warnungen der Wissenschaft und Umweltorganisationen zu ignorieren wählte und sich auf die Seite der Industrielobbyisten schlug.

    Gedichte über den Hurrikan

    Die Folgen des aktiv verhinderten Klimaschutzes bekommt in den USA oft vor allem die schwarze Bevölkerung zu spüren. So auch, als der Hurrikan Katrina 2005 New Orleans verwüstete: Fast 2000 Menschen starben in den Fluten und durch fehlende Hilfeleistungen, hunderttausende wurden obdachlos – ein Großteil davon Afroamerikaner.
    Die Umweltgerechtigkeit (Environmental Justice) ist ein traditionelles Thema in der afroamerikanischen Literatur und Poesie der USA. Es gibt allein drei Gedichtbände, die sich nur mit Katrina auseinandersetzen. Einer stammt von Patricia Smith, einer gefeierten Dichterin in den USA: „Blood Dazzler“ – Blut-Blender, 2010 für den National Book Award nominiert. Darin beschreibt Smith die Schicksale der Opfer, aber sie versetzt sich auch in den Hurrikan selbst hinein: „Katrina“ ist tatsächlich „eine Frau, die sich Gedanken macht“, so Smith.
    Patricia Smith liest aus „Blood Dazzler“ (2010):

    Redaktionell empfohlener externer Inhalt


    Ich bin damit einverstanden, dass mir externe Inhalte angezeigt werden. Damit werden personenbezogene Daten an Drittplattformen übermittelt. Deutschlandradio hat darauf keinen Einfluss. Näheres dazu lesen Sie in unserer Datenschutzerklärung. Sie können die Anzeige jederzeit wieder deaktivieren.


    Sie können solche externen Einbettungen mit diesem Schalter wieder deaktivieren (Datenschutzerklärung).

    Klimakrise und Kapitalismus

    Neben der Gegenwartsbeschreibung und dystopischen Folgen des Klimawandels beschäftigt sich die Climate Fiction aber auch mit Hoffnungsschimmern und Lösungswegen. Ein prominenter Vertreter dieser Richtung ist der Kalifornier Kim Stanley Robinson.
    In seiner 2004-2007 erschienenen Klima-Trilogie „Science in the Capital“ spielt der bekannte Science-Fiction-Autor durch, wie sich die Rettung der Erde im Zeichen des fortgeschrittenen Klimawandels vollziehen könnte.
    Vortrag von Stanley Kim Robinson: Wie das Klima die Gesellschaft verändert

    Redaktionell empfohlener externer Inhalt


    Ich bin damit einverstanden, dass mir externe Inhalte angezeigt werden. Damit werden personenbezogene Daten an Drittplattformen übermittelt. Deutschlandradio hat darauf keinen Einfluss. Näheres dazu lesen Sie in unserer Datenschutzerklärung. Sie können die Anzeige jederzeit wieder deaktivieren.


    Sie können solche externen Einbettungen mit diesem Schalter wieder deaktivieren (Datenschutzerklärung).

    Im 2017 erschienenen Roman „New York 2140“ sind hingegen alle Rettungsversuche zu spät gekommen: Mehrere Flutwellen haben weltweite Verwüstungen angerichtet, Downtown Manhattan steht 15 Meter unter Wasser. Die New Yorker haben eine Art Ökosubkultur entwickelt und die Bürotürme in Wohngenossenschaften umgewandelt. Aber New York ist noch immer die Metropole des Finanzkapitals und in Uptown Manhattan blüht die Immobilienspekulation.
    Kim Stanley Robinson: „New York 2140“
    Heyne, München 2017
    816 Seiten, 16,99 Euro
    Vor diesem Hintergrund widmet sich Robinson dem Zusammenhang von Klimakrise und Kapitalismus – und der Frage, wie ein anderes Zusammenleben aussehen könnte. Unter anderem spielt er die Verstaatlichung des Finanzsystems durch. Was heute unrealistisch klingen mag, ist für Robinson nur eine Frage der Zeit:
    „Als Science-Fiction-Autor sagst du: Was nicht passieren kann, wird nicht passieren. Also kann der Kapitalismus nicht weiter expandieren und immer weiter alles zerstören, etwas wird passieren. Es ist nicht heraus, was es sein wird und wie man es nennen wird, aber es wird kein Kapitalismus sein.“
    Lesen Sie das vollständige Manuskript zur Sendung: Manuskript als PDF.
    Produktion dieser Langen Nacht:
    Autoren: Jane Tversted und Martin Zähringer; Sprecher: Sabine Arnhold, Cathlen Gawlich, Anika Mauer, Jörg Hartman, Michael Rotschopf, Lisa Hrdina; Regie: Beate Ziegs; Redaktion: Dr. Monika Künzel; Webbearbeitung: Constantin Hühn
    Über die Autoren:
    Jane Tversted, geboren in Kopenhagen, lebt seit 1993 in Berlin. Sie hat Germanistik und Philosophie studiert. Sie übersetzt ins Dänische und publiziert seit 2012 Feature, Hörspiele und Reportagen für ARD und DLF.

    Martin Zähringer, geboren im Schwarzwald, studierte in Berlin und Kopenhagen Neue Deutsche Literatur und Nordistik und arbeitet seit 2004 als Literaturkritiker für Print und Funk. Seit 2012 gemeinsam mit Jane Tversted als Featureautor tätig.

    Das Autorenteam bewegt sich thematisch an den Schnittstellen von Kunst, Politik und Gesellschaft, primär mit einem internationalen Fokus. Letzte Features aus ihrer Feder: „Gemeinnütziger Widerstand“ SWR 2019, „Climate Fiction“ WDR/DLF 2018.  Mit dem "Climate Cultures network berlin" kuratieren sie das 3-tägige „Climate Fiction Festival“ im Juni 2020 im Literaturhaus Berlin.

    Tuesday, March 3, 2020

    Would someone remind Sam Jordison at The UK Guardian that he represents all Guardian readers not just himself!

     UPDATE:
    COVERUP IN BEIJING: Chinese whistleblowers say virus recovery 'fake, it's all fake' ... U.S. Customs STILL NOT screening passengers from hot-spots... Fans Banned From NCAA Basketball Tournament... Chaos at hospitals...
    KUDLOW: STAY AT WORK... POSITIVE IN IBIZA... Vatican reports first case... Mecca deserted in chilling video... Study predicts 15 million dead...

     Reading group: which climate science fiction should we read in March?

    From Mary Shelley to Margaret Atwood, the genre has been worrying over climate change for centuries. Please help The Guardian book guy and Sci-fi cult member Sam Jordison choose one from many novels

    https://www.theguardian.com/books/booksblog/2020/mar/03/reading-group-which-sf-climate-fiction-should-we-read-in-march
     

    I asked Sam Jordison at the Guardian in the UK: ''Sam, why not call them what they are -- cli-fi novels?''

    He replied ''basically'' FUCK YOU! What he actually wrote in his reply to my polite comment was: ''Dan, I did think about it, but it hurt too much!"

    I then replied to his silly juvenile joke, unbecoming of a books columnist the Guardian, and what did he do? He deleted by comment calling him a juvenile books editor at the Guardian and my post now reads: This comment was removed by a moderator because it didn't abide by our community standards. Replies may also be deleted. For more detail see our FAQs.

    RE:

    For this month’s reading group, we at the Guardian are after nominations for books that have something to say about the climate crisis. They can be sci-fi novels or cli-fi novels.

    It’s been a while since we last tackled Skiffy, and since we’re in the middle of an ongoing climate emergency, we thought we’d focus on fiction that is based in the science endorsed by experts; a serious subject, but not at all limiting.

    The climate and changing weather have been among the most fertile subjects for speculative fiction since at least the days of the ark. Older, in fact, since flooding also had such a big influence on the epic of Gilgamesh and Enkidu. It’s perhaps stretching the definition of climate to say that if Aeolus had kept his bag of winds closed, Aeneas would never have been blown off course and the subsequent body of western literature would have been utterly different. But it is true to say that nearly all ancient epics were governed by the moods of the Mediterranean climate, the furies of the equinox and Zephyr’s willingness to blow away the winter.

    There are plenty more recent classics to choose from. One of the very first books that we would recognise as (almost!) modern science fiction, for instance, was Mary Shelley’s 1826 novel The Last Man, detailing the world festering under a black sun, flooding and subsequent migrations. Then there are all the pioneering SF climate novels from the latter half of the 20th century, such as Kate Wilhelm’s Where Late The Sweet Birds Sang and JG Ballard’s The Drowned World. More recently, there have been hugely important novels such as The Windup Girl by Paolo Bacigalupi, Kim Stanley Robinson’s New York 2140, Margaret Atwood’s MaddAddam trilogy, Jeff VanderMeer’s Annihilation, NK Jemisin’s mighty Broken Earth trilogy, and – depending on what you think might have happened – Cormac McCarthy’s The Road. There are probably hundreds more to choose from; after all, this is one of the biggest stories of our time.

    If you want to put a book forward for consideration, just post a nomination in the comments below. If you say a thing or two about it, so much the better. Towards the end of the week, I’ll put the nominations in a waterproof hat and the one that comes out will be our subject for the month. I’m looking forward to seeing your suggestions except that I will delete anything that Dan Bloom sends in as a comment or a reply to a comment. I, Sam Jordison am kind of the world and I can delete any Guardian reader I want!


    I asked Sam Jordison at the Guardian in the UK: ''Sam, why not call them what they are -- cli-fi novels?''

    https://www.theguardian.com/books/booksblog/2020/mar/03/reading-group-which-sf-climate-fiction-should-we-read-in-march

    ''Cli-Fi and Its Distant Cousin Sci-Fi"




    ''Cli-Fi  and Its Distant Cousin Sci-Fi''
    by Professor Darren Harris-Fain
    Auburn University at Montgomery USA

    *** Slightly edited for clarification and amplification by this blog


    One of the first documented uses of “cli-fi,” short for “climate fiction,” was an April 20,
    2013 story on National Public Radio’s Weekend Edition (produced by Angela Evancie), which on its website titled
    the piece “So Hot Right Now: Has Climate Change Created a New Literary Genre?”

    The answer
    to that question, of course, was yes! Remeber, this was 2013. Now it's 2020.

    Climate change has been the topic this new genre for
    decades, and that genre is “cli-fi”—climate fiction. It may be true that climate change is an
    increasingly frequent topic in contemporary realism; this is part of the reason why TheCult Encyclopedia of Cult Science Fiction says, “Fiction centred on climate change is referred
    to as Cli-Fi, a term coined by literary activist Dan Bloom in 2011 at cli-fi.net ''
     (Langford).

    Before cli-fi was a thing, sci-fi was already on the scene.

    Before discussing how science fiction has dealt with climate change, it’s worth clarifying
    what we mean by “science fiction.” The term, now 90 years old, is misleading because much
    of it is not really about science, in contrast with how romance fiction includes romance, crime
    fiction includes crime, and Westerns are set in the West. It would be more accurate to call it
    “scientific worldview fantastic fiction,” because the fiction in science fiction is informed by the
    rationalist, materialist worldview that has developed since the rise of science in the modern era.
    It might also be just as accurate to call science fiction “the literature of change,” since it
    embraces scientific findings about how the way things are now is not the way they were in the
    past. History also tells us this, obviously, but the scientific worldview extends beyond history
    and tells us that our world is not only different from previous eras politically, culturally, and
    technologically but also, thanks to the disciplines of geology and biology, that our planet and our
    very selves are the result of major changes over the course of eons.

    Shaped by history as well as science, science fiction tends to project the inevitability of
    change into the future. Will we continue to evolve, and if so, how? How might new technologies
    change how we live? What if cataclysmic events—of terrestrial, extraterrestrial, or human
    origin—threaten our very existence? Science fiction offers imaginative possibilities for such
    scenarios and more.

    In this way, science fiction is a subgenre within the fantastic, that branch of imaginative
    literature that presents readers with situations that significantly deviate from the world we know,
    in contrast with contemporary and historical realism. Yet we should recognize that, even though
    it is fantastic, science fiction is not to be confused with fantasy, another branch of the fantastic.
    Fantasy, according to critical consensus, offers characters and/or situations that depart from the
    scientific worldview, whether in the form of ghosts, vampires, and other supernatural creatures
    or through the depiction of things like magic or characters like elves, dragons, and the like.
    Science fiction, on the other hand, is (mostly) consistent with our current state of scientific
    knowledge, even if it imagines characters and situations that do not exist in our world now.
    Fantasy could never happen, given what we know of the universe; science fiction conceivably
    could.

    In projecting possible futures, science fiction thus considers scientific plausibility and
    often attempts to extrapolate tenable developments from past knowledge and current situations.
    It is therefore not surprising that, in its history from the nineteenth century to the present, its
    3
    authors have considered how the environment might change, either through natural disasters or
    human-made ones or through the long passage of time. However, it should be stressed that
    science fiction writers are not trying to predict the future; rather, they’re projecting possible
    futures based on current knowledge as settings for fictional narratives. As a result, science fiction
    writers often get things wrong—but sometimes they get things right.

    One of the earliest practitioners of science fiction to envision an altered environment was
    H. G. Wells, beginning with his novel The Time Machine (1895). The Time Traveller (his name
    is never given) describes his adventures voyaging through the fourth dimension. Most of the
    novel occurs in AD 802,701, and this world of the far future does not seem radically changed in
    terms of climate, though he does witness the disappearance of his house and its replacement with
    a garden. However, it is decidedly different in terms of the ruins of civilization the Traveller
    encounters, with much of the former London recaptured by vegetation and the bifurcation of
    humanity into two separate species. Threatened by the Morlocks who have stolen his machine,
    the Traveller manages to reactivate the device and travel millions of years beyond his late-
    Victorian time, there witnessing a dying Earth. The sky is no longer blue, and the air is thinner.
    Green vegetation is everywhere, but the only living creatures he sees are a huge butterfly and
    dozens of monstrous crustaceans. The sea, ringed with salt, barely moves in this windless world.

    As the Traveller says:
    I cannot convey the sense of abominable desolation that hung over the
    world. The red eastern sky, the northward blackness, the salt Dead Sea, the stony
    beach crawling with these foul, slow-stirring monsters, the uniform poisonous-
    looking green of the lichenous plants, the thin air that hurts one’s lungs: all
    contributed to an appalling effect. I moved on a hundred years, and there was the
    4
    same red sun—a little larger, a little duller—the same dying sea, the same chill
    air, and the same crowd of earthy crustacea creeping in and out among the green
    weed and the red rocks. (Wells, The Time Machine 65)

    The Traveller moves even further into the future, “watching with a strange fascination the
    sun grow larger and duller in the westward sky, and the life of the old earth ebb away. At last,
    more than thirty million years hence, the huge red-hot dome of the sun had come to obscure
    nearly a tenth part of the darkling heavens” (65). Wells imagines a far-future world where life
    may go on, but the climate changes due to the inexorable forces of nature—a natural world not
    designed with any endpoint in mind by a God for whom humanity is a special creation.
    Wells also questions the existence of a supernatural being whose providence governs
    human affairs in his short story “The Star” (1897). In the near future (near to the late Victorians,
    that is), Earth is threatened by a celestial object hurtling through the solar system that, after
    colliding and merging with Neptune, continues toward the sun, looking like a new star in the
    heavens. As it heads toward Earth, it increases in size, and eventually the heat of the object is
    felt. Scientists fear it will collide with Earth as well, but complete catastrophe is averted as the
    “star” instead passes by the Earth and heads toward the sun. Even so, such a massive object
    passing so near the planet brings forth extreme meteorological disasters as it approaches: storms
    and floods, earthquakes and volcanoes, and intense heat; its gravitational pull also alters Earth’s
    orbit. Even after the “star” is gone, “men perceived that everywhere the days were hotter than of
    yore, and the sun larger …” (152). Iceland, Greenland, and Baffin Bay become “green and
    gracious” (152), the ice at the poles is considerably melted, and humanity moves “northward and
    southward toward the poles of the earth” (152) because of the planet’s increased warmth. The
    calamity is not of human origin, but Wells’s story nonetheless reveals a scientific view about the
    5
    precarious nature of our climate. Later writers would pick up the theme of an altered climate due
    to astronomical phenomena, among them Larry Niven in “Inconstant Moon” (1971).

    A changed climate caused by calamity is also present in Richard Jefferies’s novel After
    London; or, Wild England (1885). The nature of the disaster, vaguely understood from the
    perspective of the twenty-first century, is never made clear (though some suspect it was caused
    by a celestial body passing near the earth, as in Wells’s story), but its results are manifest:
    England’s climate has been altered, a vast lake covers much of the center of the country, and
    most of the country has been reclaimed by forests except for London, which has become a toxic
    swamp.

    In these three works and many others found in the history of science fiction, climate
    change is presented as a natural phenomenon, with humanity helpless in the face of powerful
    physical forces to do anything about it. However, Victorian writers earlier than Wells noted how
    industrialization was affecting the world around them, thus implicating civilization for its
    discontents. In chapter 5 of Book 1 of Hard Times (1854), for example, Charles Dickens
    famously depicts the smoke-filled sky of his fictional northern industrial village of Coketown,
    with its “black canal” and “a river that ran purple with ill-smelling dye…” (17).
    Other Victorians extrapolated the effects of industrial pollution into the future. These
    include William Delisle Hay in The Doom of the Great City (1880) and Robert Barr in “The
    Doom of London” (The Idler, 1892), both describing a London poisoned by smog from the
    futuristic perspective of the mid twentieth century. However, the Victorian belief in progress
    often extended to an optimistic view that, while the nineteenth century might have lived under
    the cloud of the pollution generated by industrialism, further advances would lead to cleaning up
    the mess. This view would be continued by many authors into the twentieth century.
    6
    It is remarkable that in the utopias and other futuristic projections created by science
    fiction authors in the late Victorian period and into the first half of the twentieth century, future
    cities are routinely depicted as well organized and spotlessly clean—kind of like the Disney
    parks’ Tomorrowland, only without Space Mountain. Even in early dystopias like Aldous
    Huxley’s Brave New World (1932) and George Orwell’s Nineteen Eighty-Four (1949), the “bad
    places” imagined by these authors are bad because of their social and political structures, not
    because they’ve damaged the planet.

    It is not until the 1950s that science fiction writers consider climate change a realistic
    possibility for the future, and they do so within a specific historical context: the end of World
    War II and the beginning of the Cold War, both presenting the threat of nuclear war and the
    concomitant altering of the environment through radiation and radioactive waste. Scores of short
    stories and novels were written imagining how climate change wrought by nuclear war could
    render the planet either entirely or partially toxic. Similarly, the publication of Rachel Carson’s
    Silent Spring in 1962 and subsequent discussions of the effects of a variety of pollutants spurred
    science fiction writers to extrapolate present-day concerns into futuristic depictions of a polluted
    planet.

    These developments in the 1950s and 1960s coincide with a broader development in
    American and British science fiction: the debate between optimism and pessimism. In contrast
    with British dystopias like Brave New World and Nineteen Eighty-Four, American science
    fiction of the first half of the twentieth century tended to follow Jules Verne and progress-
    minded Victorians as a model in imagining futures filled with technological and economic
    advances. After the war, however, many writers, both American and British, began approaching
    7
    the human future more pessimistically, and possible devastation of the environment was just one
    avenue they pursued.

    A key figure in this shift was J. G. Ballard. The first of Ballard’s early novels about post-
    apocalyptic scenarios, The Wind from Nowhere (1961), does not explain the cause of the
    catastrophes: a powerful global wind eventually dries the seas and the Great Lakes. However, in
    The Drowned World (1962) it is clear global warming is the precipitating event. The year is
    2145, and much of the planet has been flooded due to increased temperatures. Likewise, in The
    Burning World (1964) a massive drought, attributed to the dumping of industrial waste into the
    world’s oceans, has dried up smaller bodies of water.
    Ballard was not the only British writer to tackle the topic of disasters and catastrophes.

    Among those who do so in connection with climate, John Christopher’s The World in Winter
    (1962) imagines the effects of reduced solar radiation on the planet, specifically the United
    Kingdom, which becomes an abandoned frozen wasteland from which many flee to Nigeria.
    Other British writers imagined environmental catastrophes caused by human efforts to control
    the weather, as in John Boland’s White August (1955)—Christmas weather in July!—and John
    Bowen’s After the Rain (1958)—time to build another ark! Indeed, one key distinction between
    much science fiction and mainstream climate fiction is that the former often follow the
    Frankenstein motif of humanity attempting to control nature and creating havoc as a result,
    whereas the latter tends to depict climate change not as a result of humanity’s overreaching but
    rather stemming from long-term developments and either its resistance to curtailing its industrial
    and technological advances, its indifference to the effects of climate change, or its denial of the
    scientific consensus.
    8
    The environmental impact of pollution is addressed somewhat in Harry Harrison’s Make
    Room! Make Room! (1966) and directly in John Brunner’s The Sheep Look Up (1972); both
    novels employ multiple points of view, as if to emphasize the effects on humanity as a whole and
    not just a handful of characters. Such works coincided with the rise of the ecology movement in
    the late 1960s and the 1970s. This movement also influenced the writing of the utopian novel
    Ecotopia (1975) by Ernest Callenbach, in which Washington, Oregon, and part of northern
    California secede from the U.S. and establish an environmentally conscious state designed to
    avert the ecological damage found in a story like James Blish’s “We All Die Naked” (1969), in
    which rising carbon dioxide levels, causing the greenhouse effect, lead to melting polar ice and
    rising sea levels, with New York City now a new Venice.

    Since the 1970s, science fiction authors depicting possible future scenarios—especially if
    working in the dystopian mode—have frequently presented settings ravaged by pollution,
    radiation, or both. For instance, even though the focus of Margaret Atwood’s The Handmaid’s
    Tale (1985) lies elsewhere, the increasing infertility that drives much of its premise stems from
    environmental damage caused by pollution and radiation. Several science fiction novels deal
    with the effects of rising sea levels caused by the greenhouse effect. One example is David
    Brin’s Earth (1990); in its AD 2038 setting, global warming has contributed to rising sea levels
    and increasingly severe storms and threats to a growing number of species.

    Regrettably, some science fiction authors, like some segments of the American public
    and its politicians, have expressed skepticism about climate change, among them Michael
    Crichton’s State of Fear (2004), which was lambasted by scientists for its inaccuracies and
    misrepresentations, and Fallen Angels (1991) by Larry Niven, Jerry Pournelle, and Michael
    9
    Flynn. The latter ironically is in fact a climate change novel; the authors cast doubt on global
    warming only to project another ice age instead. However, such examples are outliers in the
    field. According to The Encyclopedia of Science Fiction, the realities of climate change have
    become so accepted “[o]wing to the increasing scientific consensus that our energy-intensive
    technological civilization is measurably and in all likelihood irreversibly affecting Earth’s
    climate” that “consideration of climate change has become virtually inevitable in serious Near
    Future sf of the twenty-first century” (Scott Langford).

    The contemporary science fiction writer who has addressed climate change most
    extensively is the American author Kim Stanley Robinson. For much of his career he has written
    novelistic trilogies, all of which connect in some fashion to environmental concerns. His first, the
    Three Californias trilogy, imagines three different futures for Orange County, California. In the
    third volume, Pacific Edge (1990), Robinson depicts an ecological utopia comparable to
    Callenbach’s Ecotopia, imagining how southern California could change course from its present
    state to a greener future. The prospect of transforming an existing landscape is also a key concept
    in Robinson’s Mars trilogy, whose middle volume, Green Mars (1993), concerns the
    terraforming of Mars’s alien environment into a Terran-friendly world. His third trilogy, the
    Science in the Capital series, is the most focused on climate change in his oeuvre. In Forty Signs
    of Rain (2004), Fifty Degrees Below (2005), and Sixty Days and Counting (2007), Robinson
    depicts a near-future Washington, D.C. that suffers the effects of climate change and characters
    who strive to address the matter. Robinson also addresses climate change in standalone novels
    like 2312 (2012) and New York 2140 (2017).
    10
    Given the privileging of literary fiction within certain circles and the low opinion some
    still have of science fiction, it is understandable that some people think climate fiction is distinct
    from science fiction, even if both address climate change. However, if one wishes to get a better
    picture of how authors have speculated about the possible effects of climate change, one should
    expand one’s view to take in science fiction and not just “literary” authors who have belatedly
    joined the discussion.

    11
    Works Cited
    Dickens, Charles. Hard Times, Norton Critical Edition, edited by George Ford and Sylvère
    Monod, Norton, 1966.
    Evancie, Angela. “So Hot Right Now: Has Climate Change Created a New Literary Genres?”
    National Public Radio, 20 Apr. 2013, https://www.npr.org/2013/04/20/176713022/so-
    hot-right-now-has-climate-change-created-a-new-literary-genre
    Langford, David. “Climate Change.” The Encyclopedia of Science Fiction, 3 rd ed., edited by John
    Clute et al., e-book, 31 Aug. 2018, http://www.sf-
    encyclopedia.com/entry/climate_change. Accessed 18 Nov. 2019.
    Wells, H. G. “The Star.” Selected Stories of H. G. Wells, edited by Ursula K. Le Guin, Modern
    Library, 2004, pp. 142–52.
    —. The Time Machine, Norton Critical Edition, edited by Stephen Arata, Norton,